“…According to Hill (1986, p. 55n), "The useful, though over-influential Markets in Africa (1962) is flawed by the unrealistic introduction by the two substantivist editors, Bohannan and Dalton, the one an anthropologist, the other an economist [so much for Dalton's crossappointment! ]; so far as West (but not East) Africa was concerned, they showed a lack of timedepth in associating the growth of market places with colonialism (which in northern Nigeria, for instance, was a period of little more than half a century, ending in 1960) and they were wrong in asserting that 'the more pervasive the market principle, the less the economic importance of the The correspondence surrounding the exchange between Hill (1979) and Hopkins (1979) While economics focused on how economic phenomena were identified and observed, anthropology entailed observing individuals at work through ethnographic study, participant observation, intensive data collection at the micro level (Serra 2018). Polly Hill focused on local activities and institutions that comprised or encapsulated economic life in rural Ghana (Hill 1956(Hill , 1963(Hill , 1992 and Hausaland (Hill 1972(Hill , 1977(Hill , 1982 Nigeria to get "a total picture of poverty" by directing the lens or attention on rich and poor farmers.…”