2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleasantness, emotions and perceptions induced by coffee beverage experience depend on the consumption motivation (hedonic or utilitarian)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
16

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
42
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The conducted researches verify this basic distinction empirically (Dickinger & Stangl, 2012;Klein & Ford, 2003) and simultaneously indicates that domination of the hedonic and the utilitarian motivation has significant moderating effects on the related process phenomenon (Dickinger, 2010;Kim, Galliers, Shin, Ryoo, & Kim, 2012;Labbe, Ferrage, Rytz, Pace, & Martin, 2015). When the issue being approached in terms of goal-directed and on-going processes, the hedonic and the utilitarian motivations in the relevant processes moderate the perception towards websites (Mariarcher et al, 2013), design priorities (De Marsico & Levialdi, 2004), navigational behaviors (Moe, 2003) and search intention (To, Liao, & Lin, 2007).…”
Section: On-going and Goal-directed Information Searchmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The conducted researches verify this basic distinction empirically (Dickinger & Stangl, 2012;Klein & Ford, 2003) and simultaneously indicates that domination of the hedonic and the utilitarian motivation has significant moderating effects on the related process phenomenon (Dickinger, 2010;Kim, Galliers, Shin, Ryoo, & Kim, 2012;Labbe, Ferrage, Rytz, Pace, & Martin, 2015). When the issue being approached in terms of goal-directed and on-going processes, the hedonic and the utilitarian motivations in the relevant processes moderate the perception towards websites (Mariarcher et al, 2013), design priorities (De Marsico & Levialdi, 2004), navigational behaviors (Moe, 2003) and search intention (To, Liao, & Lin, 2007).…”
Section: On-going and Goal-directed Information Searchmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although there has been considerable research on taste-aroma cross-modal interactions and perception, interactions involving trigeminal stimuli are less understood. Tastants and odorants certainly influence one another, enhancing one another in congruent tasteodor pairs, such as sweet taste and fruity odor, sweet taste and almond odor, or salty taste and cheese odor, even when the odorant is present at subthreshold levels (Auvray & Spence, 2008;Barba, Beno, Guichard, & Thomas-Danguin, 2018;Dalton, Doolittle, Nagata, & Breslin, 2000;Frank & Byram, 1988;Haber et al, 1977;Labbe, Ferrage, Rytz, Pace, & Martin, 2015;Linscott & Lim, 2016;Niimi et al, 2014;Stevenson, Prescott, & Boakes, 1999). However, in the absence of one or the other, odors can evoke a taste perception in the absence of a tastant, but a taste cannot evoke an odor perception in the absence of an odorant (Niimi et al, 2014;Thomas-Danguin, Sinding, Tournier, & Saint-Eve, 2016).…”
Section: Cross-modal Flavor Interactions and Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, coffee was suitable for the study because it can be framed in a utilitarian or hedonic manner (Labbe, Ferrage, Rytz, Pace, & Martin, 2015).…”
Section: Study 1: the Coffee Studymentioning
confidence: 99%