2015
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.163323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleasantness of facial profile and its correlation with soft tissue cephalometric parameters: Perception of orthodontists and lay people

Abstract: Objective:This study was aimed to evaluate the perception of orthodontists and of lay people about the facial profile and its possible correlation with cephalometrics parameters.Materials and Methods:A total of 20 evaluators were divided into two groups (10 orthodontists and 10 people with no relation to such area – lay people). They were asked to evaluate the photographs of 25 young males and of 25 young females, aged 17–24-year-old (mean age of 22.3 years, standard deviation 2.41 years). Photographs were ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of Marchiori et al , participants’ profile was not correlated with magnitude of NLA angle. 9 However, in our study, better profiles would be expected by decreasing nasolabial angle, anterior facial height and angle of mandibular plane. In Espinar et al ’s research (Class II patients), the highest displacements were in the lower third of the face; and Ils, Li, and Pog’ points showed the most significant changes (horizontal dimension).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In the study of Marchiori et al , participants’ profile was not correlated with magnitude of NLA angle. 9 However, in our study, better profiles would be expected by decreasing nasolabial angle, anterior facial height and angle of mandibular plane. In Espinar et al ’s research (Class II patients), the highest displacements were in the lower third of the face; and Ils, Li, and Pog’ points showed the most significant changes (horizontal dimension).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The use of cephalometric parameters in the comprehension of face characteristics is still an important instrument in the orthodontic treatment planning. [ 11 12 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has poorly described the investigation on the association between perception of esthetic results and cephalometric norms after treatment 8,9 . Similarly, most perception studies have used different evaluators such as laypeople, orthodontists, and dental students, and a few studies have focused on patient perceptions 6,7,[10][11][12] . This justifies the need for patients themselves to evaluate esthetic perception, as they might provide useful information when seeking to associate these data with those of cephalometric standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%