2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2010.00726.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleasure, Happiness and Romanticism: A Critical Survey

Abstract: This survey article offers a brief history of literary studies of pleasure, and describes the intellectual context in which these appeared in the 1980s and 90s, when consumption was a major theme in the humanities and social sciences. More recently, a turn to ‘happiness’ in economics and neuroscience invites a new attention to ideas of positive affect in texts of the Romantic period. Other shifts, including the return to prominence of the aesthetic, and a turn away from certain aspects of ideology critique and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This renewed attention to literary form, and to the ways in which form allows history to register as affect rather than cognition, participates in two broader trends in Romantic studies that have already been mapped in this journal: the increasing attention to emotion and affect (Favret, ‘The Study of Affect’) and the return to prominence of literary form and the aesthetic (see Boyson). At the risk of reducing the complex distinctions between often very different approaches to form, I believe that Hartman’s work and the recent studies that take up his legacy differ in some respects from what Marjorie Levinson has attempted to systematize as ‘the new formalism’.…”
Section: Form Without History: Hartman and The ‘New Formalism’mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This renewed attention to literary form, and to the ways in which form allows history to register as affect rather than cognition, participates in two broader trends in Romantic studies that have already been mapped in this journal: the increasing attention to emotion and affect (Favret, ‘The Study of Affect’) and the return to prominence of literary form and the aesthetic (see Boyson). At the risk of reducing the complex distinctions between often very different approaches to form, I believe that Hartman’s work and the recent studies that take up his legacy differ in some respects from what Marjorie Levinson has attempted to systematize as ‘the new formalism’.…”
Section: Form Without History: Hartman and The ‘New Formalism’mentioning
confidence: 91%