2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleistocene shell tools from Lake Mungo lunette, Australia: Identification and interpretation drawing on experimental archaeology

Abstract: Three freshwater mussel shell tools recovered from the Lake Mungo lunette, in semi-arid south-eastern Australia with bracketing age estimates of 40-30 ka, and a possible fourth tool with bracketing age estimates of 50-40 ka, are described. An experimental approach, combined with detailed structural and taphonomic analysis of the shell establishes the presence of both deliberate cultural modification and wear traces from use on the mussel fragments. The characterization of Australian Pleistocene stone artefacts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, information was recorded about the types of hearths encountered, including any associated food remains or tools (Stern, 2015). This was followed by more detailed studies of particular activity traces, with an initial focus on chipped stone artefacts (Spry, 2014), grindstones (Fullagar et al, 2015a) and shell tools (Weston et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, information was recorded about the types of hearths encountered, including any associated food remains or tools (Stern, 2015). This was followed by more detailed studies of particular activity traces, with an initial focus on chipped stone artefacts (Spry, 2014), grindstones (Fullagar et al, 2015a) and shell tools (Weston et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of human occupation in the Willandra following final lake retreat has likewise received limited attention compared with the late Pleistocene (Barbetti and Allen, 1972; Barbetti and McElhinny, 1972; Bell, 1991; Bowler and Price, 1998; Bowler et al, 1970, 2003; Long et al, 2014, 2018; Olley et al, 2006; Shawcross, 1998; Shawcross and Kaye, 1980; Stern, 2015; Stern et al, 2013; Webb et al, 2006; Westaway et al, 2013, 2017). Traces of human activity post-15 ka have been observed on the Lake Mungo lunette, and elsewhere in the Willandra system, including hearths, chipped stone artefacts, faunal remains and grinding stones (Allen, 1972; Anderson et al, 1984; Dare-Edwards, 1979; Fitzsimmons et al, 2014; Fullagar et al, 2015a, 2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cascading chain of lakes, formed along an ancient channel belt of the Lachlan River, contains evidence for lake levels and fauna extending over more than 140,000 yr (Bowler and Price, 1998;Bowler et al, 2012;Long et al, 2014;Fitzsimmons et al, 2014Fitzsimmons et al, , 2015Westaway et al, 2017). The area is listed as a World Heritage Site, and preserves some of Australia's most significant archaeological sites, including the world's oldest recognised ritual burial, and Australia's earliest human fossils at Lake Mungo (Thorne et al, 1999;Bowler et al, 2003;Olley et al, 2006), together with a long record of human resource use based on grinding stones, hearths, middens, shell tools, and fish otoliths (Bowler, 1998;Stern et al, 2013Stern et al, , 2015Long et al, 2014;Fullagar et al, 2015aFullagar et al, , 2015bWeston et al, 2015). These are key sites in the Australian archaeological record, although river marginal dunes formed by deflation of river bed sands are also beginning to reveal an ancient archaeological record (e.g.…”
Section: Past Studies In the Riverine Plainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Aboriginal use of shell as tools, for ornamentation and other cultural activities is well‐represented in the Australian ethnohistorical record (e.g., Balme & O'Connor, 2019, p. 178; McCarthy, 1957; Mulvaney, 1961), and there are a wealth of international studies focusing on the use, manufacture and social utility of shell artefacts (e.g., Bar‐Yosef Mayer, Bonsall, & Choyke, 2017). Despite this ubiquity, shell technology has received far less attention than other forms of archaeological data in Australian studies (Przywolnik, 2003, p. 12), and there remain significant gaps in the “criteria that can be used to identify and interpret shells across a wide range of taxa that have been modified for and through use” (Weston, Szabo, & Stern, 2017, p. 229).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of an experimental usewear study, Weston et al. (2017, p. 229, 236) identified three definite and one possible hyriid shell tool/s on the Lake Mungo lunette. All were recovered from Pleistocene contexts which, based on their stratigraphic associations, suggested a possible age range of between 40 and 30 ka (Unit C) and 50−40 ka (base of Unit B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%