2018
DOI: 10.1002/dc.24129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleomorphic and atypical multinucleated giant cells in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas: A diagnostic pitfall in cytology and a review of the literature

Abstract: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) is a rare low‐grade malignancy typically occurring in young women. Occasionally, these neoplasms present with pleomorphic to atypical multinucleated giant tumor cells which may mimic high‐grade malignancy. Our patient is a 25‐year‐old male who presented with one year of intermittent epigastric pain. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a 3.1 × 2.5 cm mass in the pancreas body. Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration of the mass showed large pleomorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 3, the large atypical multinucleated neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for nuclear β-catenin, cyclin-D1, and PR, while they were negative for CK AE1/AE3 and chromogranin, with a low proliferation index, confirming the diagnosis of SPN. Similar giant cells have recently been described in a few reports [23][24][25]. Interestingly, all of our cases with atypical cells occurred in relatively older patients, leading to the consideration of pancreatic carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As can be seen in Figure 3, the large atypical multinucleated neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for nuclear β-catenin, cyclin-D1, and PR, while they were negative for CK AE1/AE3 and chromogranin, with a low proliferation index, confirming the diagnosis of SPN. Similar giant cells have recently been described in a few reports [23][24][25]. Interestingly, all of our cases with atypical cells occurred in relatively older patients, leading to the consideration of pancreatic carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…SPN of the pancreas is an uncommon, low‐grade, malignant epithelioid neoplasm with cytomorphologic and IHC overlap with a wide array of entities spanning the biologic spectrum from benign neoplasms to highly aggressive malignancies. Particularly confounding is the presence of bizarre pleomorphism and atypical multinucleated giant cells, which are known to occur in a subset of SPNs . In the absence of classic clinical and cytomorphologic features, IHC plays an important role in distinguishing SPN from other tumors within the differential diagnosis, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ki-67 IHC was not pursued in our cytology case but was found to be low (<3%) in the resection specimen. It should be noted that randomly scattered pleomorphic cells (endocrine atypia) may be present in EUS-FNA samples from PanNETs, and pleomorphic and multinucleated cell have also been described in PSPPNs [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overlap of cytomorphologic features between PanNETs and PSPPNs can result in difficulty when attempting to accurately classify EUS FNA samples, and in some instances ancillary IHC studies may not allow for exact classification, as the synaptophysin immunoreactivity expected in PanNETs may on occasion be present in PSPPNs, and spurious β -catenin immunoreactivity may be rarely encountered in PanNETs. A recent error reduction focused study of the cytologic criteria for the diagnosis of PSPPNs by EUS-FNA emphasized the presence of fine (and not coarsely granular) chromatin, nuclear grooves, pseudo papillae, pink stroma and small intracellular cytoplasmic hyaline globules as being statistically significantly associated with PSPPNs [24]. In our case of an FNA of a gyriform PanNET with an exaggerated cobblestone-like pattern of growth, a pseudopapillary pattern was considered because of the stromal spheroids with intrinsic fibroblasts, and in some areas pink stroma was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%