1975
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/68.5.847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plodia interpunctella: Effect of Sex Ratio on Reproductivity1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were different from the findings of others researchers (Brower, 1975;Burkholder, 1990;Wileyto et al, 1994;and Pierce, 1994). Brower (1975) reported that for aggregation pheromones that attract females, mass-trapping may have significant impact on a population if substantial females are removed.…”
Section: 4contrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were different from the findings of others researchers (Brower, 1975;Burkholder, 1990;Wileyto et al, 1994;and Pierce, 1994). Brower (1975) reported that for aggregation pheromones that attract females, mass-trapping may have significant impact on a population if substantial females are removed.…”
Section: 4contrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Brower (1975) reported that for aggregation pheromones that attract females, mass-trapping may have significant impact on a population if substantial females are removed. Burkholder (1990) reported that moth and beetle traps are used to detect the presence of pests by season and location within a capability, to monitor apparent changes in the size of pest populations over time, and to target focal points of infestations or entry.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12], [13]), and pest control (e.g. [14], [15]). Methodologically, these experiments differ on important aspects, including the amount of (experimental and statistical) control exerted, the temporal and spatial scale of measurement, subtleties of design and analysis, and the response measure used to quantify reproductive success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, suppression of male moths at high densities with attracticide may have only limited effect on the total population because remaining males tend to compensate by increasing their number of matings (Brower 1975). We found that when the moth density is one moth pair per 11.3 m 3 , signiÞcantly fewer eggs were laid in the simulated storage sheds with a freely exposed attracticide gel dot compared with the oviposition in storage sheds with a caged dot of attracticide or control (untreated) storage sheds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%