“…So far, studies conducted to elucidate the phylogenetic relations among Zea species showed the following evidences: i) the fertility of the hybrids is related to ploidy level. F 1 hybrids with 2n=20 or 40 and the next generations are fertile independently of the phylogenetic distance among parental species (M olina 1982, 1985; M olina and R osales 1983; R osales and M olina 1984; M olina and G arcía 1999, 2001; G arcía and M olina 1994). Conversely, 2n=30 hybrids are sterile (L ongley 1934; M olina 1978, 1985; M olina and G arcía 1999, 2001); ii) interspecific hybrids with 2n=20 chromosomes show a meiotic configuration of 10II (M olina and R osales 1983; R osales and M olina 1984; M olina and G arcía 1999, 2001; P oggio et al 1999, 2000); iii) in hybrids with 2n=30, obtained from crosses of Z. perennis (2n=40) and Z. mays, diploperennis, mexicana, parviglumis or luxurians (all 2n=20), the most frequently observed meiotic configuration is 5III+5II+5I (M azoti and R imieri 1978; M olina 1978, 1981, 1982; M olina and N aranjo 1987; M olina and G arcía 1999, 2001; P oggio et al 1999, 2000); iv) in the 2n=40 hybrid produced from the fusion of an unreduced gamete of Z. diploperennis with a normal gamete of Z. perennis (M olina 1985), as well as in the hybrid Z. mays (2n=40)× Z. perennis (M olina and G arcía 1999, 2000), the most frequent meiotic configuration is 5IV+10II, which is similar to the configuration observed in Z. perennis (M olina 1986); v) Plants treated with diluted colchicine solution (0.5×10 −4 M) during a 12 h period showed cryptic homology in the species Z. mays ssp.…”