Airway Pharmacology and Treatment 2017
DOI: 10.1183/1393003.congress-2017.pa524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plume spray force of three HFA-propelled ICS/LABA combination inhalers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the plume spray force of flutiform k-haler was compared with that of two ICS/LABA conventional pMDIs, the k-haler device had the lowest spray force, with the greatest difference (≈ 70-87%) evident at distances of 60-95 mm, which is typical of the distance between an inhaler mouthpiece and the back of the throat [13]. Compared with the pMDIs, the k-haler device also had a more consistent plume force, which may in part be because it is a BTI and thus has none of the actuation speed variability of press-and-breathe devices.…”
Section: Drug Delivery Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the plume spray force of flutiform k-haler was compared with that of two ICS/LABA conventional pMDIs, the k-haler device had the lowest spray force, with the greatest difference (≈ 70-87%) evident at distances of 60-95 mm, which is typical of the distance between an inhaler mouthpiece and the back of the throat [13]. Compared with the pMDIs, the k-haler device also had a more consistent plume force, which may in part be because it is a BTI and thus has none of the actuation speed variability of press-and-breathe devices.…”
Section: Drug Delivery Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the properties of the device propellants may also have contributed to the observed difference in plume force. For instance, the boiling point of the k-haler device propellant (apaflurane HFA-227; − 16.4 °C) is higher than that of the propellant of some other pMDIs (norflurane HFA-134a; − 26.5 °C), with resultant differences in evaporation rate and thus, likely, plume force [13]. The particle size and lung deposition of fluticasone and formoterol delivered via the flutiform k-haler [14] are comparable to those delivered by the flutiform (fluticasone propionate + formoterol fumarate) pMDI [15].…”
Section: Drug Delivery Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study that compared the plume force of FP/ FORM 125/5 μg K-haler®, fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate 125/25 μg (FP/SAL) from the Seretide® Evohaler® pMDI, and 125/25 μg FP/SAL from the Sirdu-pla® pMDI, the FP/FORM K-haler® plume was 70-87% less forceful than the Seretide® and Sirdupla® plumes, at 60 to 95 mm distances [44]. This can decrease drug impaction at the back of the throat and improve delivery to the lungs.…”
Section: Documentation Of Added Therapeutic Value and Place In The Trmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FP/FORM pulmonary bioavailability administered via the k-haler® was similar to the levels achieved when administered via the pMDI without a spacer; hence, the k-haler® would be expected to provide similar efficacy to the pMDI [43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Fp/form K-haler® Pulmonary Bioavailabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plume force of the FP/FORM k-haler (125/5 μg) was compared with that of Seretide and Sirdupla ® (Mylan EMEA, Saint Priest, France) pMDIs (both FP/salmeterol xinafoate [SAL]; 125/ 25 μg) in vitro [51]. The typical distance between an inhaler and the back of the throat is 60-95 mm in adults, so plume force was measured at multiple distances up to 95 mm using a plastic disk target attached to a sensitive load cell, connected to a force tester.…”
Section: In Vitro Plume Force Studymentioning
confidence: 99%