Plural Nature(s): An Overview of Their Sociocultural Construction

Abstract

The social construction of nature aims to emphasise that the concept of nature has multiple meanings that vary in different socio-cultural contexts. This underlines the multiple ways in which both structures and individuals understand, explain, and engage with nature and the environment. Consequently, nature and cultures/societies are not separate entities, but are intertwined in complex and interdependent relationships. Therefore, nature is the result of human perceptions and social practices. The way we interact with, perceive, interpret, and value nature is influenced by a given society’s history and sociocultural factors. This intimate relationship is closely linked to power–knowledge and influence relations. Those with more power can impose a particular vision of, and relationship with, nature, resulting in inequalities and potentially harmful relations that can explain the environmental degradation that the contemporary world faces globally, despite its expression in particular contexts, thus configuring plural natures.

Voices of the absent: The agency of Nature and Future in climate regeneration

“…Central to this challenge is the task of not merely integrating marginalized populations into the deliberative process, but fundamentally reconceptualizing our relationship with nature and acknowledging the interests of future generations. Unlike marginalized populations, Future Generations and Nature Representatives face an ontological hurdle-they are often overlooked in deliberative processes, leading to a failure to acknowledge their agency and consider their interests [3]. In this opinion paper, we argue the need to enlarge the circle of climate deliberation.…”

Understanding Socioculturalism in Early Childhood Education: Current Perspectives and Emerging Trends

“…Erkan et al (2021), referring to Alexander and Entwisle's school transition model, identify familial ties and culture as non-academic factors in early childhood development. Culture, then, is dynamic and ever-evolving and reflects the interactions and exchanges between groups and societies (Alves & Vidal, 2023;González et al, 2024).…”

Natures instead of nature—plural perceptions and representations of nature and its challenges for ecological transition: a systematic review of the scientific production

“…Dominant groups influence society's attitudes and interactions with the environment, sustaining inequalities and exploitative activities. This power asymmetry stems from a Western Cartesian narrative that divides nature and society, maintaining colonial, capitalist, and patriarchal ideas that support environmental injustices [14]. Furthermore, marginalized people, especially women, are doubly disenfranchized under this paradigm, vulnerable to exploitation and dominance alongside nature.…”