2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plutonium oxide benchmark problems for the SOURCES code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of neutron yields are presented in Table 2. References about measurements are available in [10]. Table 2 shows an acceptable agreement between CHARS and the measurements with a discrepancy between -12% and 6.41% for the total yield.…”
Section: Benchmark With Cesar 533mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of neutron yields are presented in Table 2. References about measurements are available in [10]. Table 2 shows an acceptable agreement between CHARS and the measurements with a discrepancy between -12% and 6.41% for the total yield.…”
Section: Benchmark With Cesar 533mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This leads to the peaks in energy range 2-2.1 MeV, 2.2-2.3 MeV and 2.6-2.7 MeV. In the work of E.F. Shores [10] a benchmark of the SOURCES code was performed using neutron spectra measurements of several plutonium oxides of various compositions. This benchmark was also used to validate CHARS.…”
Section: Benchmark With Cesar 533mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measured total neutron yields from five plutonium oxide samples were collected in paper [23]. Two samples were measured at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) with using neutron coincidence counter and others at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Savannah River Plant (SRP), and at Pacific Northwest Laboratories (PNL).…”
Section: Plutonium Oxidementioning
confidence: 99%