2016 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles &Amp; Internationa 2016
DOI: 10.1109/esars-itec.2016.7841341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM-less machine topologies for EV traction: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the rated current (I max = 10 A), 120 Udc voltage, and greater machine speed set at 6000 rpm, the approach described in Refs. [10,11] is used to examine the torque against speed and power versus speed waveshapes of the proposed machine. The comparison of the CPSR performances for the initial and optimised topologies is shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Cpsr Of Asd-ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the rated current (I max = 10 A), 120 Udc voltage, and greater machine speed set at 6000 rpm, the approach described in Refs. [10,11] is used to examine the torque against speed and power versus speed waveshapes of the proposed machine. The comparison of the CPSR performances for the initial and optimised topologies is shown in Figure 14.…”
Section: Cpsr Of Asd-ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the IPM synchronous machines are highly versatile and well-suited for numerous electric vehicles (EVs) due to their magnetic saliency, which enables them to generate torque by utilising both the PM and reluctance torque. These qualities have subsidised to the increasing popularity of IPM synchronous machines as the preferred choice for driving Electric Vehicles, including models like Lucid, Camry, Leaf, Honda-Accord, Mitsubishi-Outlander, Renault Zoe, Audi-e-Tron, Porsche-Taycan, Tesla Model-3, Toyota Prius 2010 model, and others [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, both SPM and IPM are more expensive than asynchronous induction motors (IMs). Nevertheless, automotive industry is now greatly interested in the reduction of rare-earth magnets, especially in high-grade ones, due to unreliable supply chains and price instability [86], [87]. Furthermore, high temperature class magnets must be used to achieve the needed overload capability, and a particular care must be given not to demagnetize them.…”
Section: Electric Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why PMSMs have this advantage is because of the high energy density neodymium magnet used in their rotors. However, the high cost of neodymium magnets and the large disadvantage of PMSMs is that almost all of the neodymium reserves are in China [38]. IMs are the most preferred electric motor topology not only in electric vehicles but also in all applications due to their simple and robust structure, high efficiency at high speeds and the ability to produce high maximum torque similar to PMSMs [38][39].…”
Section: Fig 6 Vehicle Suspension Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high cost of neodymium magnets and the large disadvantage of PMSMs is that almost all of the neodymium reserves are in China [38]. IMs are the most preferred electric motor topology not only in electric vehicles but also in all applications due to their simple and robust structure, high efficiency at high speeds and the ability to produce high maximum torque similar to PMSMs [38][39]. IMs are also the most preferred motor topology in light electric vehicles due to their smooth operation at high temperatures and low costs depending on the insulation class.…”
Section: Fig 6 Vehicle Suspension Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%