2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00123-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Central and Eastern Europe:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability in the four urban areas included in this study was comparable to that observed throughout Europe, with the highest PM concentrations being measured in eastern and southern Europe. [33][34][35] Average home outdoor PN concentrations were lower than those measured at the fixed sites in Helsinki (ϳ44%), Athens (ϳ34%), and Birmingham (ϳ6%) with comparable site-to-site variation ((%⌬C): 41.7-52.8%), whereas mean PN concentration at the fixed site was approximately 60% lower than those measured in outdoor home sites in Amsterdam (Table 2). This may be explained by the importance of traffic counts and the distance to the street 23,36 outside residences in suburban areas compared with the fixed site for different centers.…”
Section: Residential Outdoor-to-fixed Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The variability in the four urban areas included in this study was comparable to that observed throughout Europe, with the highest PM concentrations being measured in eastern and southern Europe. [33][34][35] Average home outdoor PN concentrations were lower than those measured at the fixed sites in Helsinki (ϳ44%), Athens (ϳ34%), and Birmingham (ϳ6%) with comparable site-to-site variation ((%⌬C): 41.7-52.8%), whereas mean PN concentration at the fixed site was approximately 60% lower than those measured in outdoor home sites in Amsterdam (Table 2). This may be explained by the importance of traffic counts and the distance to the street 23,36 outside residences in suburban areas compared with the fixed site for different centers.…”
Section: Residential Outdoor-to-fixed Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another study, based on 143 IMPROVE sites in the year 2001, showed that sulfates, carbon and crustal material were responsible for most of the measured PM 2.5 at the majority of sites in the US (Malm et al, 2004). The temporal variation and spatial distribution of PM 2.5 concentrations have also been reported in Switzerland (Gehrig and Buchmann, 2003), Austria (Gomiscek et al, 2004), and six central and eastern European countries (Houthuijs et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For PM10 concentrations at several urban and rural sites in Switzerland Monn et al [21] reported 10-33 µg/m 3 , Roosli et al [22] reported 28 µg/m 3 , and Gehrig et al showed [23] 22.5-35.9 µg/m 3 . A two to threefold concentration range (from 41 to 98 µg/m 3 ) was found for PM10 in Central and East European countries: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovak Republic [24]. The concentrations in the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, and Hungary were considerably higher than the Austrian data [1].…”
Section: Mass Concentration Of Pm10 and Spatial Distribution Patternsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Aerozolio dalelių savybės ir koncentracija kinta laike ir erdvėje priklausomai nuo jų emisijos šaltinių tipo, stiprio ir geografinės vietos. Taigi, ivairiais aspektais vykdomi aerozolio dalelių tyrimai skirtingose pasaulio vietose yra labai aktualūs ir dažnaiįjungiamiįįvairių pasaulinių programų sudėtį [19,24,25]. Pagrindinis šio darbo tikslas buvo nustatyti aerozolio dalelių, kurių skersmuo yra mažesnis nei 10 µm, masės koncentracijos erdvinės sklaidos Vilniaus mieste ypatumus, paros ir sezoninę jos kaitą beiįvertinti toli esančių taršos šaltinių poveikį.…”
Section: Aerozolio Dalelių (<10 µM) Koncentracijos Vilniuje Kaitaunclassified