2014
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.07.0255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM2.5 Emissions from Hand-Held Sparklers: Chemical Characterization and Health Risk Assessment

Abstract: The central goal of this work is to improve our understanding of the distinctive and unusual chemistry of aerosol particles released from firework displays and their potential health risks due to inhalation exposure. The chemical composition of fine particles (PM 2.5 ) released from three commonly used sparklers (low smoke sparklers (LSS), whistling sparklers (WS) and colored sparklers (CS)) was investigated. In particular, total and water soluble elemental fractions (22 elements) and 13 polycyclic aromatic hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fontana, particle mass was nearly 2 times that of the nonrefractory mass in the morning and at night on firework days, and the D M_mode of nonrefractory aerosol components were nearly the same, with the D M_mode falling between 480 and 520 nm. The discrepancy between SEMS and nonrefractory AMS mass on firework days is likely due to high concentrations of heavy metals in firework emissions (Betha & Balasubramanian, ). A bimodal size distribution was observed for nonrefractory organic and nitrate aerosol particles on nonfirework days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fontana, particle mass was nearly 2 times that of the nonrefractory mass in the morning and at night on firework days, and the D M_mode of nonrefractory aerosol components were nearly the same, with the D M_mode falling between 480 and 520 nm. The discrepancy between SEMS and nonrefractory AMS mass on firework days is likely due to high concentrations of heavy metals in firework emissions (Betha & Balasubramanian, ). A bimodal size distribution was observed for nonrefractory organic and nitrate aerosol particles on nonfirework days.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where DF i is the deposition efficiency of particles in each region; C i is the metal concentration in each particle size (ng m −3 ); and IR is the inhalation rate assumed to be 10 m 3 d −1 for children and 20 m 3 d −1 for adults under normal conditions [18,19]. Because most human activities occur at approximately 1.5 m above the ground, concentrations of heavy metals at the 1.5-m height were used to calculate deposition fluxes in the present study.…”
Section: Calculation Of Deposition Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence these elements were selected to estimate the ILCR. The formulas for calculating CDI, HQ, and ILCR are as follows [12,19,21,22]:…”
Section: Assessment Of Human Health Risk Through Inhalation Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown carbon (BrC) (Andreae and Gelencser, 2006;Moosmüller et al, 2011), which absorbs light more efficiently at shorter visible wavelengths (400 to 700 nm) than BC, has become an important research topic because it is an indicator of biomass burning and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and differs from BC in its effects on radiative transfer. The nature of BrC is especially important in Asian countries where source emissions differ from those of North America and Europe (Betha and Balasubramanian, 2014;Chuesaard et al, 2014;Gargava et al, 2014;Pervez et al, 2015). More information on the light absorption properties of ambient aerosols would be useful, especially if it could be acquired as part of the ongoing chemical speciation networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%