2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PM2.5 exposure of various microenvironments in a community: Characteristics and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of data points were classified as home for the highlighted participants (mean: 65%, median: 69%) (Table S2). This is slightly higher, but consistent with previous personal exposure studies (Bekö et al, 2015;Hsu et al, 2020;Quinn et al, 2018). Data points were classified in these microenvironments at an average of 31% (median: 16%) of the time, therefore non-home exposures may be significant in the long-term (Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The majority of data points were classified as home for the highlighted participants (mean: 65%, median: 69%) (Table S2). This is slightly higher, but consistent with previous personal exposure studies (Bekö et al, 2015;Hsu et al, 2020;Quinn et al, 2018). Data points were classified in these microenvironments at an average of 31% (median: 16%) of the time, therefore non-home exposures may be significant in the long-term (Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…also reported that the within-subject variability (81.3% of σ Total 2 ) in personal exposure concentrations of PM2.5 was higher than the between-subject variability in concentrations (18.7% of σTotal 2 ) for university students (Hsu et al, 2020). In contrast, long-term (annual) concentrations of PM2.5 were fairly attributable to the between-site or between-group variability (47.8%).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cooking emissions from commercial restaurants are also outdoor sources for urban‐community‐level PM 2.5 (Lung et al., 2020 ; H. Xu et al., 2020 ). Of these emissions, barbecues and Chinese restaurants are the main sources of PM 2.5 pollution (Hsu et al., 2020 ). Thus, based on the points data of barbecues and Chinese restaurants, the impact of cooking emissions was calculated by using the buffering analysis, separately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, based on the points data of barbecues and Chinese restaurants, the impact of cooking emissions was calculated by using the buffering analysis, separately. In addition, more than 2 million people in Hong Kong, follow the Buddhist/Taoist religion, and during the periods of prayer incense and joss paper burnt in temples both during festival periods and as a common part of daily life (C. Chen et al., 2021 ; Hsu et al., 2020 ). Based on the points data of temples, the impact of incense/joss paper burning was calculated using buffering analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%