2012
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PML regulates PER2 nuclear localization and circadian function

Abstract: Studies have suggested that the clock regulator PER2 is a tumour suppressor. A cancer network involving PER2 raises the possibility that some tumour suppressors are directly involved in the mammalian clock. Here, we show that the tumour suppressor promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) protein is a circadian clock regulator and can physically interact with PER2. In the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), PML expression and PML-PER2 interaction are under clock control. Loss of PML disrupts and dampens the expression of clock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Per2 Ϫ/Ϫ mice have been recently reported to have increased glucosestimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) (59), contrary to what has been reported for Clock ⌬19 and Bmal1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice (33,43). One could argue that the PER proteins are not ideal representatives of the negative arm, since they appear to predominately moderate the timing of the negative feedback rather than directly inhibiting CLOCK and BMAL1 (25,35), whereas CRY proteins are much stronger inhibitors of E-box-mediated transcription (19,46). The effect of Cry deficiency on metabolism has not yet been investigated.…”
contrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Finally, Per2 Ϫ/Ϫ mice have been recently reported to have increased glucosestimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) (59), contrary to what has been reported for Clock ⌬19 and Bmal1 Ϫ/Ϫ mice (33,43). One could argue that the PER proteins are not ideal representatives of the negative arm, since they appear to predominately moderate the timing of the negative feedback rather than directly inhibiting CLOCK and BMAL1 (25,35), whereas CRY proteins are much stronger inhibitors of E-box-mediated transcription (19,46). The effect of Cry deficiency on metabolism has not yet been investigated.…”
contrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The generation of PML null mice (129/Sv-Pmltm1Ppp [Pml −/− ]; 129S3 [as per Festing et al 1999]) has been previously described (Wang et al 1998;Miki et al 2012). For these studies male Pml −/− mice and wild type controls (Pml +/+ ), both in the same genetic background (129/Svev), were used.…”
Section: Test Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although PER and CRY proteins can localize to the nucleus even in the absence of one another, binding to CRY promotes nuclear accumulation and stabilization of PER proteins (Kume et al, 1999;Miyazaki et al, 2001;Yagita et al, 2002). Moreover, the CoRNR site of PER2, a binding motif for nuclear receptors, and the promyelotic leukemia protein PML have both been reported to be important for nuclear entry (Albrecht et al, 2007;Miki et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%