2019 20th International Conference on Intelligent System Application to Power Systems (ISAP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/isap48318.2019.9065968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PMU Based Data Driven Approach For Online Dynamic Security Assessment in Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The RF model with the current features is trained based on cross-validation, and the importance score of each feature and the performance evaluation index of the RF model are calculated. The RF model can measure the feature importance according to the Gini index or the error of the out-of-bag samples; the latter was chosen in this study (Jaiswal et al, 2019). The R-squared error (R 2 ) was chosen to evaluate the model performance, the value of R 2 was in the range (0, 1), and the model performed better when R 2 tended to 1 (Alimi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Feature Selection Based On the Rfecv Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) The RF model with the current features is trained based on cross-validation, and the importance score of each feature and the performance evaluation index of the RF model are calculated. The RF model can measure the feature importance according to the Gini index or the error of the out-of-bag samples; the latter was chosen in this study (Jaiswal et al, 2019). The R-squared error (R 2 ) was chosen to evaluate the model performance, the value of R 2 was in the range (0, 1), and the model performed better when R 2 tended to 1 (Alimi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Feature Selection Based On the Rfecv Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yun used the static voltage stability margin as a severity index of the possible state of a power system for voltage safety risk assessment and introduced a support vector machine (SVM) to achieve a rapid calculation of severity while optimizing the parameters of the SVM by the genetic algorithm (Yun et al, 2017). To improve the computational speed of the dynamic risk assessment of power systems, Jaiswal classified the contingencies into two categories, namely, security and insecurity, and trained a random forest (RF) with voltage magnitude and phase, current magnitude, real power, and reactive power as features and the contingency categories as labels (Jaiswal et al, 2019). Liu applied iterative random forests to calculate the severity of possible system states for dynamic security risk assessment of power systems (Liu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%