Pneumatic Conveying Design Guide 1990
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-408-04719-7.50008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pneumatic Conveying System Design Procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluidized mode transportation of granular matter through an enclosed channel, having a porous fabric at its base through which air trickles up, is referred to as fluidized motion conveying. In addition to having the inherent advantages of pneumatic conveying systems such as low cost, flexible routing, low maintenance, enclosed nature, and environmental hygiene (Mills 1990;Wypych & Yi 2003), this system also yields the advantages of dense phase pneumatic conveying, i.e., higher mass flow rate, reduced duct wear and particle attrition, and greater energy efficiency as well (Hong et al 1993;Levy 2000;Molerus 1996). Early industrial applications of such systems were made by the German company Polysius, the American company Huron Portland Cement Company, and the Fuller Company for transporting cement, however, the typical large installation described in the literature involved the transportation of alumina (Bushell & Maskell 1960;Butler 1974;Leitzel & Morrisey 1971), as reported by Woodcock and Mason (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluidized mode transportation of granular matter through an enclosed channel, having a porous fabric at its base through which air trickles up, is referred to as fluidized motion conveying. In addition to having the inherent advantages of pneumatic conveying systems such as low cost, flexible routing, low maintenance, enclosed nature, and environmental hygiene (Mills 1990;Wypych & Yi 2003), this system also yields the advantages of dense phase pneumatic conveying, i.e., higher mass flow rate, reduced duct wear and particle attrition, and greater energy efficiency as well (Hong et al 1993;Levy 2000;Molerus 1996). Early industrial applications of such systems were made by the German company Polysius, the American company Huron Portland Cement Company, and the Fuller Company for transporting cement, however, the typical large installation described in the literature involved the transportation of alumina (Bushell & Maskell 1960;Butler 1974;Leitzel & Morrisey 1971), as reported by Woodcock and Mason (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wypych and Yi 7 put forward a set of models to predict the blockage of powder mechanics in the case of low‐velocity slug flow with granular materials. Mills 8 illustrated the relationship between inlet air velocity and solid loading ratio by a graph. Although the critical conditions to suppress flow blockage have received much attention from many researchers, flow blockage is stalling a potential engineering problem, and the pipeline is very prone to blockages when the slug flow is unstable 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9. Pressure drop through a bed of particles versus superficial air velocity -source: (Mills, 1990). (1 ) …”
Section: Minimum Fluidization Velocity Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%