Pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus in Chinese: the differences from Caucasian and its application in the extended transsphenoidal approach

Abstract

In recent years, the transsphenoidal approach has been extensively used surgically to treat parasellar, suprasellar, clival, and even petrous lesions. Extended pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus (SS) is considered an indispensable element for the extended transsphenoidal (ETS) approach. Because most anatomical studies of the ETS approach use Caucasian subjects, the present study aims to clarify the pneumatic extension types in Chinese individuals as well as any differences from those in Caucasians and analyze these differences with respect to the application of the ETS approach. A total of 200 computed tomography (CT) images of SSs and 18 adult cadaveric heads were selected for observation and measurement. The conchal, presellar, and sellar types comprised 6, 28.5, and 65.5% of subjects, respectively; according to the extra extension, the prevalence of the lateral, clival, lesser wing, and combined extension sinus types was 11.4, 21.4, 0.8, and 48.1% of subjects, respectively. The percentages of pneumatization of the anterior and posterior clinoid processes, pterygoid process, and optic strut were 5.0, 1.0, 22.3, and 7.0%, respectively. Onodi cells were observed in 61.1% of the sides of the cadaveric heads, including 30.6% with good pneumatization with identifiable optical or ICA bulges. These features were related to poor lateral and clival gasification in Chinese compared with Caucasians, which might make extended surgery more dangerous. However, the anterior pneumatization, especially the higher presentation of Onodi cells, ensures that the anterior ETS approach can be performed safely in Chinese patients. In general, measurements showing smaller sinus volumes and thicker bones with identifiable bone landmarks that are hard to find compared with those in Caucasians suggest increased surgical risks in the Chinese population. In this situation, carefully analysis of presurgical CT and magnetic resonance imaging scans is important. Furthermore, in the ETS approach, the use of stricter intraoperative technological devices such as neuronavigation and ultrasound Doppler is advisable.

Incidence of optic canal fracture in the traumatic optic neuropathy and its effect on the visual outcome

“…We assumed that the fracture signals may be interfered by bony overlap of deformed fractures or the congenital anatomical abnormalities in the posterior ethmoid sinus and/or sphenoid sinus. Nowadays, some variations in paranasal sinus anatomy such as Onodi cell or periorbital gas cell can be detected by CT scans of paranasal sinuses 30 31. However, there is no specific data showing the correlation between these anatomical variations and OCF detection.…”

The Septation of the Sphenoidal Air Sinus. A Cadaveric Study

“…The hollow space located within the body of the sphenoid bone is called the sphenoidal sinus (Singh et al, 2016). The sphenoidal sinus is said to vary exceptionally in shape and localization (Kayalioglu et al); and it is also divided into two unequal parts by an asymmetric bony intersinus septum which lies on the vertical plane of the sinus (Hamid et al, 2008;Hewaidi & Omami, 2008;Lu et al, 2011). In some cases there may be more than one intersinus septa dividing the sinus, and intrasinus (accessory or partial) septa may also be present (Sareen et al, 2005;Kapur et al, 2012;Chougule & Dixit, 2014;ELKammash et al, 2014;Sˇtokovic´ et al, 2016).…”

Relationship between sphenoid sinus volume and accessory septations: A 3D assessment of risky anatomical variants for endoscopic surgery

“…In fact, it is minimally invasive and proved to be less traumatic than traditional microsurgical approaches (Unal et al, ). With time, the fields of applications progressively increased, including not only the removal of pituitary tumors (Jankowski et al, ), but also the treatment of lesions in other skull areas, such as anterior and posterior cranial fossa, cavernous sinus, and clivus (Jho, ; Lu et al, ).…”