2018
DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.168.15308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pneumothorax catamenial: resultats de 18 cas opérés

Abstract: L'objectif de notre étude était de proposer une approche thérapeutique du pneumothorax cataménial à partir des résultats de nos 18 cas opérés. Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective de Janvier 1994 à Décembre 2016 qui a concerné 18 patientes âgées en moyenne de 32,2 ans opérées d'un pneumothorax cataménial droit (16 cas) et bilatéral (2 cas). Les patientes ont été réparties en 3 groupes en fonction de l'évolution dans le temps de notre attitude chirurgicale: le groupe 1 (G1) de janvier 1994 à juin 2006, le groupe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of case series studies, 60% (9/15) were rated as good, 20% (3/15) as fair, and 20% (3/15) as poor quality (Table 1). The main risks of bias in these studies were inadequate length of follow-up [32,36,136,147] and no description of statistical analysis used [32,36,136,138,140,[142][143][144][145]147]. Both case-control studies [135,186] had no sample size calculation, no blinded evaluators, and no adjustment of confounding variables.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of case series studies, 60% (9/15) were rated as good, 20% (3/15) as fair, and 20% (3/15) as poor quality (Table 1). The main risks of bias in these studies were inadequate length of follow-up [32,36,136,147] and no description of statistical analysis used [32,36,136,138,140,[142][143][144][145]147]. Both case-control studies [135,186] had no sample size calculation, no blinded evaluators, and no adjustment of confounding variables.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%