2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1567-5688(07)71354-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Po13-344 Cardiochek Pa Cholesterol-Testing Device Compared to Diagnostic Laboratory Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study found that total cholesterol levels from the CardioChek PA device did not differ significantly from the laboratory method, but triglyceride and HDL levels were underestimated. 9 Average triglyceride levels calculated by the CardioChek PA were 19 mg/dL lower and HDL levels were 7 mg/dL lower than the laboratory method. 9 When these values were used to calculate LDL cholesterol, no significant differences were found.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study found that total cholesterol levels from the CardioChek PA device did not differ significantly from the laboratory method, but triglyceride and HDL levels were underestimated. 9 Average triglyceride levels calculated by the CardioChek PA were 19 mg/dL lower and HDL levels were 7 mg/dL lower than the laboratory method. 9 When these values were used to calculate LDL cholesterol, no significant differences were found.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 78%
“…9 Average triglyceride levels calculated by the CardioChek PA were 19 mg/dL lower and HDL levels were 7 mg/dL lower than the laboratory method. 9 When these values were used to calculate LDL cholesterol, no significant differences were found. 9 Dale et al compared the performance of the Cholestech LDX versus the CardioChek PA and found the Cholestech LDX device to be superior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation