2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/aae9b7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poincaré–Plebański formulation of GR and dual simplicity constraints

Abstract: We revise the classical continuum formulation behind the Spin Foam approach to the quantization of gravity. Based on the recent applications of the current EPRL-FK model beyond triangulations, we identify the tension with the implementation of the 'volume' part of simplicity constraints, required for the passage from the topological BF theory to gravity. The crucial role, played by 4d normals in the linear version of constraints, necessitates the extension of the configuration space, and we argue to switch fro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction follows some developments in [18] by enlarging the phase space with independent triad variables. Similar techniques have recently been developed in [19]. It should be noted however that the focus is way different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction follows some developments in [18] by enlarging the phase space with independent triad variables. Similar techniques have recently been developed in [19]. It should be noted however that the focus is way different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility to be mentioned is to consider all constraints linearly, along the lines proposed in [6,11]. This would probably necessitate first to enlarge the space of variables of the theory, and then quantize the respective topological model, which is elusive as of yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 4-volume constraint is decidedly quadratic in nature, this discrepancy may pose an additional question: which form of volume simplicity is an appropriate one to impose? One such alternative, formulated linearly, appeared in [12], and in [11] we gave its dual reinterpretation, actually, as prescribing unambiguous 3-volume.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The original EPRL amplitude was defined on a complete graph K 5 , corresponding to the boundary of a 4-simplex. The model has been generalized to arbitrary graphs [10], although it can be argued that the model would have to be amended to include the correct implementation of the volume simplicity constraints [11,12].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were ω ∈ R is the deformation parameter, σ(C) = ±1 is the type of crossing (ove-or under-crossing, see figure 2), and with (11) where the X + I (X − I ) are an orthonormal basis of the selfdual (anti-self-dual) su (2). The operator R C acts as en- (5).…”
Section: Deformation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%