2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2016.7759602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Clouds Registration with Probabilistic Data Association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional point cloud registration methods: ICP [4] is the best-known algorithm for solving rigid registration problems; it alternates between finding point cloud correspondences and solving a least-squares problem to update the alignment. ICP variants [34,37,5] consider issues with 1 https://github.com/WangYueFt/dcp the basic method, like noise, partiality, and sparsity; probabilistic models [12,13,17] also can improve resilience to uncertain data. ICP can be viewed as an optimization algorithm searching jointly for a matching and a rigid alignment; hence, [11] propose using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to optimize the objective directly, which can yield a better solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional point cloud registration methods: ICP [4] is the best-known algorithm for solving rigid registration problems; it alternates between finding point cloud correspondences and solving a least-squares problem to update the alignment. ICP variants [34,37,5] consider issues with 1 https://github.com/WangYueFt/dcp the basic method, like noise, partiality, and sparsity; probabilistic models [12,13,17] also can improve resilience to uncertain data. ICP can be viewed as an optimization algorithm searching jointly for a matching and a rigid alignment; hence, [11] propose using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to optimize the objective directly, which can yield a better solution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for soft rejections, Bergström et al [17] compared the effect of three M-estimators on ICP and proposed an algorithm to auto-tune them, but they only provided results based on simulated data of simple geometric shapes. Agamennoni et al [18] proposed a soft rejection function based of Student's T-distribution for registration between a sparse and a dense point clouds. But, they compare their algorithm to another complete ICP solution, where multiple stages changed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was proposed in [9], and several extensions and generations have been presented. In [10] the authors introduce probabilistic association in ICP, where instead of matching point-to-point, they use a t-distribution to model the distances to a set of target points and assign a weight to each association. ICP iteratively finds point correspondences between point clouds and minimizes a distance cost function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%