2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases: From methods to devices

Abstract: Graphical Abstract Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
234
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 533 publications
(407 reference statements)
0
234
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these detection methods have good performance, they still have many shortcomings [203]. For electrochemical detection methods, they have high sensitivity, fast response, and low cost, but stability and susceptibility to interference are weak [204].…”
Section: Magnetic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these detection methods have good performance, they still have many shortcomings [203]. For electrochemical detection methods, they have high sensitivity, fast response, and low cost, but stability and susceptibility to interference are weak [204].…”
Section: Magnetic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional confirmatory tests include ELISA, PCR, DNA chips and chromatographic techniques, which require sophisticated instruments, professional operators, and costly chemicals. More recently, newer POC biosensors have emerged as newer diagnostic tools but many of them suffer from low sensitivity, specificity and reliability ( Sheikhzadeh et al, 2021 , Wang et al, 2021 ). Biosensors are rapidly becoming a cutting-edge novel technology in disease diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their simplicity and the ability to be easily modified and applied to different fields, aptamerbased SPR biosensors have been used to detect DNA [18], protein [19,20], nanoparticle [21], small molecules [22] and microRNA [23]. Compared with the conventional methods and other sensing strategies, this aptamer-based SPR biosensor system has several advantages such as faster, simpler, lower-cost, more practical, and better stability [24]. The proposed aptamer-based SPR biosensor could detect HIV-related DNA sensitively and specifically with a wide linear range from 1 pM to 150 nM and a detection limit of 48 fM, which is promising for the point-of-care detection of HIV infections [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%