2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point -of -care testing (POCT) in molecular diagnostics: Performance evaluation of GeneXpert HCV RNA test in diagnosing and monitoring of HCV infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
53
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
53
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the sensitivity of Xpert compared to Roche was 100% (95% CI 99.2, 100.0). This finding is similar to two previous studies that compared the performance of Xpert against Abbott RealTime among mostly GT1 and GT3 patients: Gupta et al found a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% CI 88.8, 97.7) and McHugh et al 98.0% (95% CI 96.1, 99.1) . While both Gupta and McHugh reported false negatives, none occurred in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, the sensitivity of Xpert compared to Roche was 100% (95% CI 99.2, 100.0). This finding is similar to two previous studies that compared the performance of Xpert against Abbott RealTime among mostly GT1 and GT3 patients: Gupta et al found a sensitivity of 94.4% (95% CI 88.8, 97.7) and McHugh et al 98.0% (95% CI 96.1, 99.1) . While both Gupta and McHugh reported false negatives, none occurred in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our LOA was greater than the predefined clinical agreement limit for the maximum allowed difference of 0.5 log 10 IU/mL, and 13.9% (=63/454) of samples fell outside this limit. Our LOA was also wider compared to previous studies by: Gupta (mean difference of 0.04 log 10 IU/mL and LOA of −0.42 and 0.49), McHugh (mean difference of 0.03 log 10 IU/mL and LOA of −0.41 to 0.47), and Grebely (mean difference of −0.036 log 10 IU/mL and LOA of −0.28 to 0.35) . This may be attributable to differences in sample preparation procedures and the differences in the comparator platforms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study adds to the limited literature addressing the use of HCV NAT point‐of‐care tests in sub‐Saharan Africa, raising the potential for Xpert ® HCV VL Fingerstick assay to provide a further simplified solution to existing issues related to HCV diagnosis. In addition, we add our findings to the limited data supporting the use of the Xpert ® platform in HCV genotype 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Secondly, the Xpert ® HCV VL assay was used as the gold standard as there was no local access to conventional laboratory‐based NAT testing. However, it is unlikely that this would have introduced any significant discrepancy as this assay is WHO pre‐qualified and has demonstrated excellent performance in previous validation studies . Thirdly, as local genotyping was not available, only those with historic genotypes were reported in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%