1983
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point of view in personal memories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
584
5
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 698 publications
(636 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
39
584
5
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we found that temporally distant events (both past and future) were more often represented with an O perspective (i.e., from a third-person perspective in which the individual perceives himself/herself as if he/she were observing another individual, rather than from a first-person perspective in which he/she is the subject of experience) than temporally close events (see Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Robinson & Swanson, 1993, for similar findings with regard to past events). This kind of third-person perspective may serve as a distancing mechanism, leading individuals to perceive that a past (or future) self-concept is different from the current self-concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, we found that temporally distant events (both past and future) were more often represented with an O perspective (i.e., from a third-person perspective in which the individual perceives himself/herself as if he/she were observing another individual, rather than from a first-person perspective in which he/she is the subject of experience) than temporally close events (see Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Robinson & Swanson, 1993, for similar findings with regard to past events). This kind of third-person perspective may serve as a distancing mechanism, leading individuals to perceive that a past (or future) self-concept is different from the current self-concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Participants were also asked to report the visual perspective they took in their representation of the event by assigning it to one of three categories depending on whether they "saw" themselves in their representation (observer perspective, O), saw the scene from their own perspective (field perspective, F), or felt that neither point of view fitted (N). A detailed paragraph instructed them on the distinction between the observer and field perspectives (see Nigro & Neisser, 1983).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Negative events in particular are recalled with less contextual detail (D"Argembeau, Comblain & Van der Linden, 2003;Destun & Kuiper, 1999). Nigro and Neisser (1983) showed that people can also remember events from more or less abstract perspectives: a "field" perspective entails seeing oneself as a participant in the scene, whereas an "observer"…”
Section: Remembering Emotional Events Differentlymentioning
confidence: 99%