2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point placement of late vegetative stage nitrogen splits increase the productivity, N-use efficiency and profitability of tropical maize under decade long conservation agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2012) found that the placement of fertilizer in the root zone of crop reduces nitrogen leaching from 0% to 33% over surface application. Likewise, point placement of fertilizer resulted in improved nutrient-use efficiency, since higher concentration of nutrients around the root zone results in better uptake of nutrients and minimizes losses ( Schmitt et al., 2001 ; Fengqin et al., 2018 ; Dass et al, 2019 ; Nayak et al., 2022 ; Paramesh et al., 2023 ). Similarly, in our current study, point placement of fertilizer (PNM 3 ) performed significantly ( p =0.05) superior in nutrient concentration as against PNM 2 , PNM 4 , and PNM 5 , since the nutrient forage area of roots in PNM 2,4,5 is reduced, resulting in suboptimal crop growth (CGR, RGR, and NAR) and DMA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2012) found that the placement of fertilizer in the root zone of crop reduces nitrogen leaching from 0% to 33% over surface application. Likewise, point placement of fertilizer resulted in improved nutrient-use efficiency, since higher concentration of nutrients around the root zone results in better uptake of nutrients and minimizes losses ( Schmitt et al., 2001 ; Fengqin et al., 2018 ; Dass et al, 2019 ; Nayak et al., 2022 ; Paramesh et al., 2023 ). Similarly, in our current study, point placement of fertilizer (PNM 3 ) performed significantly ( p =0.05) superior in nutrient concentration as against PNM 2 , PNM 4 , and PNM 5 , since the nutrient forage area of roots in PNM 2,4,5 is reduced, resulting in suboptimal crop growth (CGR, RGR, and NAR) and DMA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been investigated for improving nutrient- and water-use efficiencies for better crop productivity; such as application of organic amendments [ [12] , [13] , [14] ], fertilizer microdosing [ [15] , [16] , [17] ], integrated crop-livestock systems [ [18] , [19] , [20] ], conservation agriculture [ [21] , [22] , [23] ], and integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) [ [24] , [25] , [26] ]. Indeed, research have been implemented in SSA on ISFM that uses the combined application of organic and inorganic amendments for crop intensification [ [27] , [28] , [29] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rice-wheat (RW) cropping system dominates in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of South Asia covering an area of 13.5 Mha [1]. Besides being high water, energy, labor, and fertilizers demanding cropping system, burning crop residues, and intensive tillage practices contributed to soil degradation [2][3][4][5]. Consequently, the sustainability of the RW cropping system in the IGP of South Asia is under threat [6], promoting the need for better agri-food systems management practices [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%