2017
DOI: 10.26170/po17-05-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-Rating System for Evaluation of the Student Learning Activity: The Questions of Purpose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rule, semester work accounts for 60-70% of the maximum possible amount of points and respectively 40-30% of the final control. Among the PRS's advantages, at the discipline level, stimulation of students' regular work during semester, the possibility of self-management and self-organization of educational activities by students, objectification and transparency of assessment procedures, possibility of ranking students by academic performance are noted [32][33][34]. We consider it appropriate to use this approach to evaluate the work of students in the study of economic geography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule, semester work accounts for 60-70% of the maximum possible amount of points and respectively 40-30% of the final control. Among the PRS's advantages, at the discipline level, stimulation of students' regular work during semester, the possibility of self-management and self-organization of educational activities by students, objectification and transparency of assessment procedures, possibility of ranking students by academic performance are noted [32][33][34]. We consider it appropriate to use this approach to evaluate the work of students in the study of economic geography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%