2017
DOI: 10.1002/met.1645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point verification and improved communication of the low‐to‐medium cloud cover forecasts

Abstract: The amount of sunshine weighs heavily in our perception of the weather. It is largely determined by cloud cover, especially that at the low‐to‐medium level. Therefore, when reviewing the Hong Kong Observatory's weather symbol forecasting product, verification on the low‐to‐medium cloud field is carried out against the synoptic observations at the Hong Kong International Airport. Several metrics are used to examine the different aspects of the forecasts, and consideration is given to the non‐Gaussian nature of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forecasts were skillful according to the 3-category Gerrity score (GS) which rewards rare but correct (or close) forecasts and penalizes large categorical errors (Gandin andMurphy 1992, Jolliffe andStephenson 2012). The GS has not been used very widely; to put these values into some context, Tam and Wong (2017) reported GS values of 0.27-0.56 for 4-category forecasts of sky cover over Hong Kong from the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Even though Table 8 shows no correct high risk forecasts, the GS values of 0.27 (day 2) to 0.36 (day 0) reflect the ability to predict moderate risk when moderate or high risk occurs (rarely).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forecasts were skillful according to the 3-category Gerrity score (GS) which rewards rare but correct (or close) forecasts and penalizes large categorical errors (Gandin andMurphy 1992, Jolliffe andStephenson 2012). The GS has not been used very widely; to put these values into some context, Tam and Wong (2017) reported GS values of 0.27-0.56 for 4-category forecasts of sky cover over Hong Kong from the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Even though Table 8 shows no correct high risk forecasts, the GS values of 0.27 (day 2) to 0.36 (day 0) reflect the ability to predict moderate risk when moderate or high risk occurs (rarely).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall aim is to design specific forecast advisories for when to avoid the application of either fertilizers or pesticides because rain is predicted with high probability. A system for evaluating a weather symbol forecasting product is introduced by Tam and Wong (2017). Cloud cover forecasts from ensemble predictions are evaluated at observation sites around Hong Kong to discuss the potential of deriving site‐specific weather symbol forecasts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%