2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1812.05166
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point vortices for inviscid generalized surface quasi-geostrophic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.2 resolves the problem of justifying mSQG point vortices of identical sign from the inviscid mSQG equation in the range α ∈ [2 − √ 3, 1) left open by Geldhauser and Romito [19]. Moreover, one can view this result as a converse to Duerinckx's derivation of the inviscid mSQG family as the mean field limit of the point vortex model (1.9) with parameter α ∈ [0, 1) [16] (see also [45]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1.2 resolves the problem of justifying mSQG point vortices of identical sign from the inviscid mSQG equation in the range α ∈ [2 − √ 3, 1) left open by Geldhauser and Romito [19]. Moreover, one can view this result as a converse to Duerinckx's derivation of the inviscid mSQG family as the mean field limit of the point vortex model (1.9) with parameter α ∈ [0, 1) [16] (see also [45]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The regularity assumptions for the initial data {θ 0 i,ǫ } 1≤i≤N,0<ǫ≤1 can be lowered substantially. In the work [35], the authors work with the unique global L 1 ∩ L ∞ weak solutions due to Yudovich [48], and in the work [19], the authors construct global (but not necessarily unique) L 1 ∩ L ∞ weak solutions with which they work. Applying our method of proof in the case α ∈ (0, 1) with the weak solutions of [19] should not present a difficulty.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations