2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-wise evaluation of the growth driving direction for arbitrarily shaped delamination fronts using cohesive elements

Abstract: Point-wise evaluation of the growth driving direction for arbitrarily shaped delamination fronts using cohesive elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to criteria 1 and 2 of the approach proposed in Ref. [26]. In this study, the 𝐺 𝐺 ⁄ value at a given location on the 4-IP mid-plane is interpolated by the combination of linear shape functions and the 𝐺 𝐺 ⁄ values associated with four IPs of a 4-IP cohesive element.…”
Section: Extension To 4-ip Cohesive Elementsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to criteria 1 and 2 of the approach proposed in Ref. [26]. In this study, the 𝐺 𝐺 ⁄ value at a given location on the 4-IP mid-plane is interpolated by the combination of linear shape functions and the 𝐺 𝐺 ⁄ values associated with four IPs of a 4-IP cohesive element.…”
Section: Extension To 4-ip Cohesive Elementsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Ref. [26]. Kawashita and Hallett proposed a crack-tip tracking fatigue algorithm that assumes that only the crack-tip element experiences fatigue degradation [13]; the d𝐷 d𝑁 ⁄ of a crack-tip element was evaluated by the element length measured along the crack propagation direction and a modified Paris law, without the need to know the total cohesive zone length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if a CZM approach is used, the crack front is not defined by a line, but there is a band of damaged material ahead of the crack tip, and thus the normal direction to a front line does not apply. In this case, the concept of growth driving direction (GDD) [41] can be used. The GDD can be defined as the gradient vector field of the total specific work, ω tot , over the fracture toughness, G c , with respect to the coordinates tangent to the mid-surface (c.f.…”
Section: Fatigue Damage Rate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the link between the crack growth rate, da/dN , and the damage rate, dD/dN presented in [34]. An efficient methodology to determine the growth driving direction in 3D analysis [41] is used. In addition, the model uses a 3D CZ J-integral formulation [42] for calculating the mode-decomposed energy release rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation