2004
DOI: 10.1137/s0036142903421527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pointwise Error Estimates of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods with Penalty for Second-Order Elliptic Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these four methods, a natural question arises: How do these methods behave pointwise? Kanschat and Rannacher [8] gave a quasi-optimal convergence result in L ∞ for the interior penalty (IP) method, and Chen and Chen [6] gave weighted pointwise estimates for the same method, which implies the result in [8]. In this paper, we show weighted pointwise error estimates for the three remaining methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these four methods, a natural question arises: How do these methods behave pointwise? Kanschat and Rannacher [8] gave a quasi-optimal convergence result in L ∞ for the interior penalty (IP) method, and Chen and Chen [6] gave weighted pointwise estimates for the same method, which implies the result in [8]. In this paper, we show weighted pointwise error estimates for the three remaining methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Once one has local H 1 estimates, weighted pointwise estimates are easily obtained following the pointwise estimates proof of Schatz [12] for the standard continuous Galerkin method or a similar proof in [6] for the IP method. Therefore, our main contribution is to prove local H 1 estimates for these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the local error estimates found in [5] and [14] and the techniques used here, we can prove optimal W 1 ∞ error estimates for various DG methods on convex polyhedral domains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The Downloaded 09/28/17 to 128.178. 13 fine scale solver will be applied on a domain ω 1 , slightly larger than ω, ω 1 ⊃⊃ ω, and the overlap is denoted by ω 0 := ω 1 ∩ ω 2 . Figure 1 illustrates possible domain decompositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%