1976
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(76)90171-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poison induced pica in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether nausea/malaise contributes to the food intake-suppressive effects produced by VTA amylin receptor signaling, we availed of an established model of nausea/malaise (Alhadeff et al, 2012;Andrews and Horn, 2006;De Jonghe and Horn, 2008;Kanoski et al, 2012;Mitchell et al, 1976) by examining pica, the consumption of a non-nutritive substance (eg, kaolin silicate clay). Rats received counterbalanced intra-VTA injections of sCT (0, 0.004, 0.04, or 0.4 mg/100 nl aCSF) and intake of chow and kaolin were measured for 24 h. As in our previous experiment, the two highest doses of sCT tested (0.4 and 0.04 mg) reduced 24 h chow intake ( Figure 3a; ANOVA: F 3,18 ¼ 7.34, P ¼ 0.002; vehicle vs 0.04 or 0.4 mg, Po0.05) and 0.4 mg sCT reduced 24 h BW gain (Figure 3c; ANOVA: F 3,18 ¼ 3.38, P ¼ 0.04; vehicle vs 0.4 mg, Po0.05).…”
Section: Amylin Receptor Activation In the Vta Reduces Chow Intake Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether nausea/malaise contributes to the food intake-suppressive effects produced by VTA amylin receptor signaling, we availed of an established model of nausea/malaise (Alhadeff et al, 2012;Andrews and Horn, 2006;De Jonghe and Horn, 2008;Kanoski et al, 2012;Mitchell et al, 1976) by examining pica, the consumption of a non-nutritive substance (eg, kaolin silicate clay). Rats received counterbalanced intra-VTA injections of sCT (0, 0.004, 0.04, or 0.4 mg/100 nl aCSF) and intake of chow and kaolin were measured for 24 h. As in our previous experiment, the two highest doses of sCT tested (0.4 and 0.04 mg) reduced 24 h chow intake ( Figure 3a; ANOVA: F 3,18 ¼ 7.34, P ¼ 0.002; vehicle vs 0.04 or 0.4 mg, Po0.05) and 0.4 mg sCT reduced 24 h BW gain (Figure 3c; ANOVA: F 3,18 ¼ 3.38, P ¼ 0.04; vehicle vs 0.4 mg, Po0.05).…”
Section: Amylin Receptor Activation In the Vta Reduces Chow Intake Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory research on feeding behavior grew out of experimental psychology, mostly using rats, and more recently mice. In animal psychology, perhaps owing to the lack of a vomiting response in rodents, researchers use CFA testing (and sometimes pica, e.g., clay ingestion; Mitchell et al, 1976) to assess possible aversive effects on feeding behavior. For example, it is still an important issue for researchers working on the satiation of food intake in non-human species (with implications for the control of obesity) to distinguish the actions of variables that reduce feeding from those that produce malaise.…”
Section: Why Are Nausea and Vomiting Important In Today's World?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both LiCl and GLP-1 produce similar physiological consequences, many of which are proxies of nausea/ malaise. These effects include a reduction in food intake (McCann et al, 1989;Tang-Christensen et al, 1996) and gastric emptying (McCann et al, 1989;Wettergren et al, 1993), generation of CTA (Nachman and Ashe, 1973;Thiele et al, 1997) and pica (Mitchell et al, 1976;Kanoski et al, 2012). GLP-1 antagonists have successfully been used to block the aversive-like behaviors (eg reduction in food intake, pica, CTA) induced by LiCl (Rinaman, 1999b;Seeley et al, 2000), indicating that these manifestations of LiCl are, at least in part, mediated through GLP-1R signaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of rats (n = 8) were pretreated (after baseline and − 20 min relative to LiCl or vehicle injection) with the GLP-1R antagonist exendin-(9-39) (Ex-9, 100 μg/ml in 0.9% saline, 1 ml/kg, IP; American Peptides, Sunnyvale, CA). The dose of LiCl was chosen based on its ability to: 1) induce signs of visceral malaise (McCann et al, 1989;Meachum and Bernstein, 1992;Mitchell et al, 1976) and 2) condition a taste aversion with a single IP injection , and is therefore considered aversive. The peripheral dose of Ex-9 is at or above those demonstrated to potentiate feeding in rats under certain conditions (Turton et al, 1996;Williams et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation