Rasmus Rask Studies in Pragmatic Linguistics, Volume 2, Conversational Routine 1981
DOI: 10.1515/9783110809145.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Poison to Your Soul" Thanks and Apologies Contrastively Viewed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
7

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
122
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Bearing this in mind, different definitions have been provided for the notion of pragmatic routine, either using this terminology or equivalent terms. Some conceptualizations refer to the form of routines (Erman & Warren, 2000;Moreno Teva, 2006;Wray, 2000), while others focus on their functions (Bardovi-Harlig, 1999;Coulmas, 1981).…”
Section: Chapter 3 Pragmatic Routines and The Study Abroad Context 92mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearing this in mind, different definitions have been provided for the notion of pragmatic routine, either using this terminology or equivalent terms. Some conceptualizations refer to the form of routines (Erman & Warren, 2000;Moreno Teva, 2006;Wray, 2000), while others focus on their functions (Bardovi-Harlig, 1999;Coulmas, 1981).…”
Section: Chapter 3 Pragmatic Routines and The Study Abroad Context 92mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Guiraud et al (2011), thanking involves the basic emotion of "joy" but also the complex emotion of "gratitude". Thanking is therefore socially expected on those occasions where the speaker has been done a service by the addressee and its absence may be perceived as markedly rude and socially disruptive, as thanking is a reactive act par excellence (Coulmas 1981in Milà García, 2011). This also explains why parents insist on teaching their offspring to say 'thanks' (Norrick, 1978;Greif and Gleason, 1980).…”
Section: Thankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object of gratitude, according to Coulmas (1981), refers to some action (or action) of a benefactor or to a result of this action which arouses every verbalization of thanking or every sincere verbalization of thanking. Thanking or expressing gratitude tends to be originated just from these realistic or potential benefits a beneficiary does or will gain.…”
Section: Adaptation To the Object Of Gratitudementioning
confidence: 99%