2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poisson type approximations for the Markov binomial distribution

Abstract: The Markov binomial distribution is approximated by the Poisson distribution with the same mean, by a translated Poisson distribution and by two-parametric Poisson type signed measures. Using an adaptation of Le Cam's operator technique, estimates of accuracy are proved for the total variation, local and Wasserstein norms. In a special case, asymptotically sharp constants are obtained. For some auxiliary results, we used Stein's method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…214-215] and are already proved inČekanavičius and Roos [6]. For the proof of (15) note that (13), (14) and the trivial fact U = 2 imply that…”
Section: Lemma 33 Let Condition (3) Be Satisfied Thenmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…214-215] and are already proved inČekanavičius and Roos [6]. For the proof of (15) note that (13), (14) and the trivial fact U = 2 imply that…”
Section: Lemma 33 Let Condition (3) Be Satisfied Thenmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Applying (19) and Lemma 3.5, we get Combining the last two estimates, we get (6). The local estimate is proved using (10).…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compound Poisson approximation is frequently used to approximate aggregate losses in risk models (see, for example, [5,8,9,12,14,21]); however, in those models it is usually assumed that rvs are independent of time period n ∈ N. The compound Poisson approximation to sums of Markov dependent rvs was investigated in [6]. Numerous papers were devoted to Markov Binomial distribution, see [1,3,4,7,10,18,19], and the references therein. It seems, however, that the case of Markov chain containing absorbing state was not considered so far.…”
Section: Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining var ν (K n ) is more involved, because of correlations. A closed formula for the variance in the following proposition has been obtained by several authors (see, for example [2] and [13]). Here it is particularly compact by our use of excentricities.…”
Section: The Variance Of the Markov Binomial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%