2017
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pokémon GO: snake oil or miracle cure for physical inactivity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are in line with previous studies which explained that Pokemon Go is an augmented game that requires players to travel to various locations in the real world which the distances was relatively far. Thus, after carried out this game, players can increase their PA level to be better than before (Althoff et al, 2016;Chaput & Leblanc, 2017;Ewell et al, 2020;Kosa & Uysal, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study are in line with previous studies which explained that Pokemon Go is an augmented game that requires players to travel to various locations in the real world which the distances was relatively far. Thus, after carried out this game, players can increase their PA level to be better than before (Althoff et al, 2016;Chaput & Leblanc, 2017;Ewell et al, 2020;Kosa & Uysal, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent reviews also reported the trends of decreased PA among children and adolescents worldwide [ 13 , 14 ]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) published a global report on PA, and it concluded that 81% of adolescents aged 11–15 years do not meet the WHO recommendations of being physically active for health [ 15 ]. This physical inactivity has burdened public health indirectly as a physically inactive child is most likely to be an inactive adult [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, limitations in most of the current Pokémon GO studies should be acknowledged. Same as mentioned in previous commentaries (37,38), the main limitation is still the short-term period of follow-up. In other words, the sustainable, long-run effects of Pokémon GO on improving health remain untested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a sense, dropping out is reasonable if players get bored, lose interest, or feel a lack in time (28,35,44). Accordingly, a short-term follow-up period in the current Pokémon GO studies reflects the concern of how playing Pokémon GO can influence players' health in a long-term period (37,38), especially when maintaining players' active engagement is still required after initial novelty from the game disappears. Secondly, the study design of most of these studies is observational (cross-sectional or cohort study), where there is a lack of sufficient ability to infer a causal relationship between Pokémon GO and some health benefits identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%