2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pol η is required for DNA replication during nucleotide deprivation by hydroxyurea

Abstract: Hydroxyurea reduces DNA replication by nucleotide deprivation, whereas UV damage generates DNA photoproducts that directly block replication fork progression. We show that the low fidelity class Y polymerase Pol g is recruited to proliferating cell nuclear antigen at replication forks both by hydroxyurea and UV light. Under nucleotide deprivation, Pol g allows cells to accumulate at the G1/S boundary by facilitating slow S-phase progression and promotes apoptosis. Normal cells consequently enter apoptosis at a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of RPA-primed single-stranded DNA, a result of extensive DNA unwinding at a stalled replication fork, is essential for triggering RAD18-dependent monoubiquitination of PCNA (11,14). Consistent with this model, DNA damage-induced Pol and REV1 focus formation occurs in response to agents that strongly induce PCNA monoubiquitination, such as UV-C irradiation, hydroxyurea, aphidicolin, and cisplatin (8,15,29,39). Treatments which predominantly introduce interstrand cross-links (e.g., MMC) or alternatively, DSBs (e.g., ionizing radiation and camptothecin, a topoisomerase I poison), do not effectively induce PCNA monubiquitination or TLS polymerase focus formation (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The generation of RPA-primed single-stranded DNA, a result of extensive DNA unwinding at a stalled replication fork, is essential for triggering RAD18-dependent monoubiquitination of PCNA (11,14). Consistent with this model, DNA damage-induced Pol and REV1 focus formation occurs in response to agents that strongly induce PCNA monoubiquitination, such as UV-C irradiation, hydroxyurea, aphidicolin, and cisplatin (8,15,29,39). Treatments which predominantly introduce interstrand cross-links (e.g., MMC) or alternatively, DSBs (e.g., ionizing radiation and camptothecin, a topoisomerase I poison), do not effectively induce PCNA monubiquitination or TLS polymerase focus formation (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…While the former process requires Pol ␣ primase and unphosphorylated RPA-dependent initiation at replication origins and relies heavily on two other processive, high-fidelity polymerases (Pol ␦ and Pol ε) at replication elongation, DNA synthesis in the recovering cells mainly resumes at the arrested replication forks or starts as part of a repair process and therefore may not need the initiation step and may be mediated by nonreplicative but repair-specific polymerases (23,42,51). In support of this idea, several nonreplicative DNA polymerases, including X-family polymerases , , TdT, Y-family polymerase , B-family polymerase , and Rev1, have been found to be involved in the nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination repair synthesis of DSBs, the major type of DNA breaks induced by collapse of replication forks following HU exposure (12,19,33,42,51). In addition, it has also been shown that the Pol ␣-primase complex is not required for DSB-induced homologous recombination during the mating type switch in budding yeast (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The 293T human embryonic kidney epithelial cells were purchased from ATCC. The SV40-transformed Pol -deficient XP30RO fibroblasts and the corrected cells (XP30RO ϩ Pol ) were provided by Professor James E. Cleaver (33,34). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 g/ml of streptomycin (ATCC), and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO 2 atmosphere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%