PoLaR Annotation Guidelines

Ahn, Byron; Veilleux, Nanette; Shattuck‐Hufnagel, Stefanie; Brugos, Alejna

doi:10.17605/osf.io/usbx5

2022

DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/usbx5

|View full text |Cite

PoLaR Annotation Guidelines

Byron Ahn¹,

Nanette Veilleux²,

Stefanie Shattuck‐Hufnagel³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Publication Types

Select...

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In doing so, listeners' perception of prosodic structure correlates with both prosodic cues, i.e. PoLaR intonational categories (Ahn et al, 2019), and non-prosodic cues, i.e. syntactic break and part of speech, suggesting that these factors may serve as cues to prominence and boundary perception.…”

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Prosodic and Non-Prosodic Cues to Prominence and Boundaries: Evidence from an RPT study in Albanian

Brugos¹,

Kapia²

2021

1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports evidence from the Rapid Prosody Transcription method (RPT, cf. Cole & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2016) in the study of a little-described language. We bring forth results from two perception experiments on the prosody of Albanian, which provide important evidence in the perceptibility of prosodic and non-prosodic correlates in the language's prosodic system, shedding more light on its complexity. Albanian listeners in this study show moderate to substantial agreement in the perception of both prosodic prominences and boundaries, conforming to what has been found in RPT studies from other languages so far Baumann & Winter, 2015;Riesberg at al, 2020). In doing so, listeners' perception of prosodic structure correlates with both prosodic cues, i.e. PoLaR intonational categories (Ahn et al, 2019), and non-prosodic cues, i.e. syntactic break and part of speech, suggesting that these factors may serve as cues to prominence and boundary perception.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 93%

Prosodic and Non-Prosodic Cues to Prominence and Boundaries: Evidence from an RPT study in Albanian

Brugos¹,

Kapia²

2021

1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

PoLaR Annotation Guidelines

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Prosodic and Non-Prosodic Cues to Prominence and Boundaries: Evidence from an RPT study in Albanian

Prosodic and Non-Prosodic Cues to Prominence and Boundaries: Evidence from an RPT study in Albanian

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About