2010
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2010.2040961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polar Codes are Optimal for Lossy Source Coding

Abstract: Abstract-We consider lossy source compression of a binary symmetric source using polar codes and the low-complexity successive encoding algorithm. It was recently shown by Arıkan that polar codes achieve the capacity of arbitrary symmetric binary-input discrete memoryless channels under a successive decoding strategy. We show the equivalent result for lossy source compression, i.e., we show that this combination achieves the rate-distortion bound for a binary symmetric source. We further show the optimality of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
211
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
211
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance is compared to the best achievable rate of any coding scheme for binary DP using nested codes. We observed that typically the set F c ∩ F c s , that needs to be retransmitted in the second phase of the scheme [1] is zero for D − p larger than some small threshold. Our main theoretical contribution is an improved analysis compared to that presented in [1] on |F c ∩ F c s | and on its scaling with respect to the blocklength when D is sufficiently large or p sufficiently small.…”
Section: Arxiv:190402450v1 [Csit] 4 Apr 2019mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The performance is compared to the best achievable rate of any coding scheme for binary DP using nested codes. We observed that typically the set F c ∩ F c s , that needs to be retransmitted in the second phase of the scheme [1] is zero for D − p larger than some small threshold. Our main theoretical contribution is an improved analysis compared to that presented in [1] on |F c ∩ F c s | and on its scaling with respect to the blocklength when D is sufficiently large or p sufficiently small.…”
Section: Arxiv:190402450v1 [Csit] 4 Apr 2019mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The encoder then observes s and obtains a polar codeword s ∈ C s (F s , u Fs (m)) that satisfies the power constraint (e.g., under the individual codeword power constraint, w H (s⊕s ) ≤ D) using a successive cancellation (SC) encoding algorithm which is a randomized version of the standard SC decoding algorithm [2] (as explained in [1], in practice the standard SC decoding algorithm can be used by the encoder without modification, but the proof requires the randomized version of the algorithm). Now the encoder transmits x = s ⊕ s .…”
Section: Arxiv:190402450v1 [Csit] 4 Apr 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations