We show that polyoxides grown on phosphorus in situ doped polysilicon have larger polarity asymmetry than that on the POCl 3 -doped polysilicon. It may be not only the surface roughness between the polysilicon/polyoxide interfaces, but also the phosphorus distribution in the interfaces. For the phosphorus in situ doped poly film, the phosphorus piled up at the poly-1/ polyoxide interface should result from the out-diffusion of the poly-1 doping during the tetraethyl orthosilicate oxide deposition process. However, the phosphorus concentration near the polyoxide/top poly-2 interface was lower than the bulk concentration of the polysilicon film, which may result from insufficient phosphorus concentration near the polyoxide/top poly-2 interface without subsequent annealing and dopant activation. Therefore, this may affect the polarity asymmetry of the electrical characteristics for the phosphorus in situ doped samples. Especially, the thermal polyoxide had the largest polarity asymmetry due to very high phosphorus concentration piled up in the bottom poly-1/polyoxide interface. We also show that the top poly-2 doping process affects the phosphorus distribution in the polysilicon/polyoxide interfaces, and further, affects the polyoxide performance.Thermal oxides grown on the n+ polycrystalline silicon, i.e., polyoxides, have been used as the interdielectric 1-4 for nonvolatile memory application. However, it is well known that the polyoxides have drawbacks of a lower dielectric strength and a higher leakage current than oxides grown on the single-crystal silicon due to nonuniformity polyoxide thickness and rough asperities ͑surface roughness͒. Also, the characteristics of polyoxides have been shown to depend on the structure and morphology of the predeposited polysilicon film, which in turn are affected by the deposition temperature, doping conditions, and the oxidation temperature. [5][6][7][8][9][10] It was previously reported that the surface morphology could be improved by replacing the POCl 3 -doped polysilicon with the phosphorus in situ doped polysilicon deposited in the amorphous state. The polysilicon has more uniform small grains and thus a flatter and smoother interface 11-15 and the polyoxide grown on it has better electrical characteristics. It was also reported that more reliable dielectrics could be grown on polysilicon by using chemical vapor deposition ͑CVD͒ instead of thermal oxidation. For those CVD deposited dielectrics, the grain boundaries present in the bottom polysilicon are not incorporated in the deposited layer due to no polysilicon consumption and the surface of the polysilicon layer is not roughened, so the CVD oxide potentially has a defect density relatively independent of the bottom polysilicon. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In this paper, we present the CVD deposited polyoxide grown on the phosphorus in situ doped polysilicon, which has larger polarity asymmetry than that on the POCl 3 doped polysilicon. It may be not only the surface roughness between the polysilicon/polvoxide interfa...