1987
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(87)85181-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarity-dependent barriers and the photoisomerization dynamics of molecules in solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
135
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
135
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter would lead to a change of the rate by a factor of 1.5 at the lowest temperature, which would clearly have been seen within experimental error here. Previous studies similarly observed a temperature dependence much below that of solvent viscosity [11,33,34].…”
Section: Variable Temperature Results Suggest a Near Barrierless Reacmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The latter would lead to a change of the rate by a factor of 1.5 at the lowest temperature, which would clearly have been seen within experimental error here. Previous studies similarly observed a temperature dependence much below that of solvent viscosity [11,33,34].…”
Section: Variable Temperature Results Suggest a Near Barrierless Reacmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Such a dependence of the excited-state lifetime on both the solvent viscosity and polarity has already been observed in processes involving large-amplitude motion, with a barrier decreasing with solvent polarity. 52,53 Such a situation can be reasonably envisaged here with both the low-frequency twisting and wagging modes of the nitro group and considering the CT character of the S 1 state. Thus, we propose that in nonprotic and polar solvents, NPe*(S 1 ) decays essentially nonradiatively via a lowfrequency coordinate associated with the nitro group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99,100 For example, if the transition state is more polar, the reaction rate increases with solvent polarity. This is probably the case for 1 and 3, for which the fluorescence time constants are clearly larger in nonpolar solvents, independently of their viscosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%