2023
DOI: 10.3390/physics5020037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization and Consensus in a Voter Model under Time-Fluctuating Influences

Abstract: We study the effect of time-fluctuating social influences on the formation of polarization and consensus in a three-party community consisting of two types of voters (“leftists” and “rightists”) holding extreme opinions, and moderate agents acting as “centrists”. The former are incompatible and do not interact, while centrists hold an intermediate opinion and can interact with extreme voters. When a centrist and a leftist/rightist interact, they can become either both centrists or both leftists/rightists. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar Q and A environmental regimes have been identified elsewhere, see e.g. [96,97] 4 . The border between Q and A regimes is determined by…”
Section: Theory For the Fixation-coexistence Diagrams In Fluctuating ...supporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar Q and A environmental regimes have been identified elsewhere, see e.g. [96,97] 4 . The border between Q and A regimes is determined by…”
Section: Theory For the Fixation-coexistence Diagrams In Fluctuating ...supporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is worth noting that the annealed regime often corresponds to the limit ν → ∞ where the environmental noise ξ self averages[11,12,40,41,96,97]. Here, the case of intermediate switching with a finite number of switches prior to fixation/extinction is qualitatively similar to the case ν → ∞, and for simplicity we here refer to it as the annealed regime A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, usually only binary opinions are considered, which naturally causes society polarisation. However, modifications that allow for multiple opinions were also studied [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [14] analyzed a majority rule dynamics under the action of noise and an external modulation, and found an SR that depends on the randomness of the small-world network. There are also other works [39][40][41][42][43] that explored the combined effects of stochastic driving and an external signal on a majority rule dynamics. However, none of these works have incorporated a contrarian behavior in the dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%