1996
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/33/3/3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization dependence of trap detectors

Abstract: The sensitivity of a series of silicon trap detectors has been measured as a function of beam polarization. Measurements and numerical simulation show that very small departures from the ideal orientation of the photodiodes mounted in the trap induces a significant sensitivity to the state of polarization of the beam. Consequences of this polarization dependence for the use of trap detectors as transfer detectors in high-accuracy applications, particularly in cryogenic radiometry, are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A final consideration, to keep measurement uncertainties low, is that, when a trap detector is used to measure the radiant power of a light source (be it a tuneable laser or a quasimonochromatic beam from a monochromator system), the measurement signal has to be corrected for the experimental conditions (e.g. level of radiant power, detector temperature [5,13], spot size or polarization state [14,15]) during the actual calibration of the filter radiometer. This is because the experimental conditions when calibrating the filter radiometer usually differ greatly from those during the calibration of the trap detector.…”
Section: Planck's Law Of Thermal Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final consideration, to keep measurement uncertainties low, is that, when a trap detector is used to measure the radiant power of a light source (be it a tuneable laser or a quasimonochromatic beam from a monochromator system), the measurement signal has to be corrected for the experimental conditions (e.g. level of radiant power, detector temperature [5,13], spot size or polarization state [14,15]) during the actual calibration of the filter radiometer. This is because the experimental conditions when calibrating the filter radiometer usually differ greatly from those during the calibration of the trap detector.…”
Section: Planck's Law Of Thermal Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such configuration of self-calibrating photodiodes distribution became classical one and got the name of trap-detector. Its characteristics were widely investigated [10,11,12,13]. It is obvious that the inherent shortcoming of such systems is small angular width of the receiving polar pattern, which is caused by the relatively small size of photodiode and large path of radiation beam in them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflectance-type (three-element) trap detectors have polarization-dependent fractional response variations of about 1 × 10 −4 [ 11 ]. The reflectance loss of the S-1337 reflectance-type trap detectors increases from 0.21 % at 920 nm to 1 % at 406 nm [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they were free of back reflectance, separately calibrated filters or other optical components could be attached to their inputs without introducing additional uncertainties. The six-element version had a polarization independent responsivity [ 11 , 14 ], lower reflectance loss, and improved spatial response uniformity. Because of these advantages, the six-element transmission-type trap-radiometer is the best choice to transfer responsivity with the lowest possible uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%