2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.109992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization holographic characteristics of TI/PMMA polymers by linearly polarized exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intensities of both beams were adjusted to 0.127 W cm −2 (green laser, 532 nm). The interference angle 49 between the signal and reference beams was set to 24°, the diffraction efficiency was measured every 6 s, and the reconstruction duration was set to 0.4 s. The diffraction efficiency η is determined by eqn (1):where I +1 and I 0 denote the intensities of the first-order diffracted and transmitted beams, respectively. The photosensitivity factor ( S ) 50 of the materials and volume shrinkage ( σ ) 51 of each sample are determined as follows (eqn (2) and (3)):where I is the intensity of the signal beam (0.127 W cm −2 ), d is the thickness of the photopolymer (1.5 mm), and η is the diffraction efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intensities of both beams were adjusted to 0.127 W cm −2 (green laser, 532 nm). The interference angle 49 between the signal and reference beams was set to 24°, the diffraction efficiency was measured every 6 s, and the reconstruction duration was set to 0.4 s. The diffraction efficiency η is determined by eqn (1):where I +1 and I 0 denote the intensities of the first-order diffracted and transmitted beams, respectively. The photosensitivity factor ( S ) 50 of the materials and volume shrinkage ( σ ) 51 of each sample are determined as follows (eqn (2) and (3)):where I is the intensity of the signal beam (0.127 W cm −2 ), d is the thickness of the photopolymer (1.5 mm), and η is the diffraction efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensities of both beams were adjusted to 0.127 W cm À2 (green laser, 532 nm). The interference angle 49 between the signal and reference beams was set to 241, the diffraction efficiency was measured every 6 s, and the reconstruction duration was set to 0.4 s. The diffraction efficiency Z is determined by eqn (1):…”
Section: Holographic Measurements and Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The green laser (532 nm) with the intensity of 0.127 W/cm 2 was applied in the current study. The temporal diffraction efficiency was recorded per 6 s at the cross-angle of 24°, and the reading time was set to 0.4 s. The diffraction efficiency η is expressed as where I + 1 and I 0 represent the intensities of the first-order grating diffraction and the transmitting beams, respectively. The photosensitivity factor S of materials is expressed as where I represents the intensity value of the signal beam (0.127 W cm –2 ), d is the thickness of photopolymers (1.5 mm), and η is the diffraction efficiency.…”
Section: Experimental Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The green laser (532 nm) with the intensity of 0.127 W/cm 2 was applied in the current study. The temporal diffraction efficiency was recorded per 6 s at the cross-angle of 24°, 66 and the reading time was set to 0.4 s. The diffraction efficiency η is expressed as…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of photopolymer exhibits better holographic properties than that of PQ/PMMA [ 16 ]. Meanwhile, TI/PMMA polymers can record holographic intensity and polarization modulated gratings through long-time (second level) and short-time (millisecond level) exposure [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], exemplifying the competitiveness of holographic storage applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%