2013
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-12-00101.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization Lidar at Summit, Greenland, for the Detection of Cloud Phase and Particle Orientation

Abstract: Accurate measurements of cloud properties are necessary to document the full range of cloud conditions and characteristics. The Cloud, Aerosol Polarization and Backscatter Lidar (CAPABL) has been developed to address this need by measuring depolarization, particle orientation, and the backscatter of clouds and aerosols. The lidar is located at Summit, Greenland (72.68N, 38.58W; 3200 m MSL), as part of the Integrated Characterization of Energy, Clouds, Atmospheric State, and Precipitation at Summit Project and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gimmestad (2008) provides motivation for moving away from all δ descriptions, pointing out that d is consistent with the rest of optical physics and scattering theory. Expressing depolarization as d has since been adopted in such publications as Thayer (2009, 2012) and Neely III et al (2013). Results in the present paper will be provided in terms of both d and δ so that readers working under either paradigm can readily make use of the figures and calculations.…”
Section: Depolarization Lidar Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Gimmestad (2008) provides motivation for moving away from all δ descriptions, pointing out that d is consistent with the rest of optical physics and scattering theory. Expressing depolarization as d has since been adopted in such publications as Thayer (2009, 2012) and Neely III et al (2013). Results in the present paper will be provided in terms of both d and δ so that readers working under either paradigm can readily make use of the figures and calculations.…”
Section: Depolarization Lidar Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• with respect to both polarization analyzers (Spinhirne et al, 1982;McGill et al, 2002;Alvarez et al, 2006;David et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2009;Freudenthaler et al, 2009;Neely III et al, 2013;Bravo-Aranda et al, 2013;Freudenthaler, 2016). This type of calibration is not sensitive to polarization effects in the transmitter optics or to any optics upstream of the halfwaveplate.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Depolarization Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations