1993
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(93)90041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization of water molecules at a charged interface. Second harmonic studies of charged monolayers at the air/water interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
243
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
15
243
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Dielectric anomalies might be anticipated near the critical point of water due to ferroelectric contributions from the water itself, 23,24 or interface polarization contributions from the water [25][26][27][28] induced by the surrounding PVDF-TrFE. The ''anomaly'' in the capacitance versus temperature that we have observed is probably dynamic and does not necessarily signify any water-related transition in the film.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Dielectric anomalies might be anticipated near the critical point of water due to ferroelectric contributions from the water itself, 23,24 or interface polarization contributions from the water [25][26][27][28] induced by the surrounding PVDF-TrFE. The ''anomaly'' in the capacitance versus temperature that we have observed is probably dynamic and does not necessarily signify any water-related transition in the film.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The signal response relates to the overall arrangements of the interfacial entities (Fordyce et al, 2001;Goh et al, 1988;Luca et al, 1995) and is proportional to the incident field and the second-order nonlinear susceptibility χ (2) of the interface. When the interface is charged, due to this charge, the static electric field can induce a third-order nonlinear polarization due to the contribution of the thirdorder nonlinear susceptibility χ (3) of the solution (Ong et al, 1992;Zhao et al, 1993). In this work, the contribution of χ (3) to the total SHG signal has been ignored because there was no significant change in the interface charge with temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous experiments, we have observed a similar effect from the intrinsic charges at the interfaces with no external field applied. 12,[32][33][34] The electric field due to the surface charges polarizes the solvent molecules, i.e., water in the present studies, resulting in the breakdown of the centrosymmetry of the bulk solution (Scheme 3). When there are no surface charges, i.e., in the absence of a static field, the water molecules beyond the first few layers would be randomly oriented and consequently would not contribute to the SHG signal.…”
Section: B Shg Due To the Surface Charges On Clay Particlesmentioning
confidence: 83%