2014
DOI: 10.1021/nl501431y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization-Resolved Near-Field Mapping of Plasmonic Aperture Emission by a Dual-SNOM System

Abstract: We study the polarization characteristics of light emission and collection in the near field by the tips of a Dual-SNOM (two scanning near-field optical microscopes) setup. We find that cantilevered fiber probes can serve as emitters of polarized light, or as polarization-sensitive detectors. The polarization characteristics depend on the fiber type used for tip fabrication. In Dual-SNOM measurements, we demonstrate mapping of different field components of the plasmonic dipole pattern emitted by an aperture pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For such aperture SNOMs, which we study in this investigation, it was predicted and proven that detected signals are influenced by both the transverse electric and magnetic components of the investigated field [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Depending on the measurement configuration, a detected signal can be influenced dominantly by either the transverse electric, magnetic, or both field components [5][6][7][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Nevertheless, analytical expressions that allow the evaluation of the sensitivity of a probe to the individual investigated field components is missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For such aperture SNOMs, which we study in this investigation, it was predicted and proven that detected signals are influenced by both the transverse electric and magnetic components of the investigated field [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Depending on the measurement configuration, a detected signal can be influenced dominantly by either the transverse electric, magnetic, or both field components [5][6][7][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Nevertheless, analytical expressions that allow the evaluation of the sensitivity of a probe to the individual investigated field components is missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Compared with widely used AFM for micro/nanomanipulation, the significant advantage of ShFM is that it is easily combined with SNOM to detect near-field optical properties of the samples with its fibre probe (Betzig et al, 1992;Toledo-Crow et al, 1992). Moreover, it is possible to develop multiprobes SNOM systems (Nakayama et al, 2012;Klein et al, 2014) for application of imaging and manipulating complex structures based on ShFM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been carried out to explain the light transmission or detection processes with aperture SNOM tips [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. For example, dipole and multipole models has been widely used for describing the diffracted fields through the sub-wavelength circular aperture of SNOM tips [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. These theories are based on Bethe-Bouwkamp theory that describes the diffraction of a normal incident plane wave through a sub-wavelength metallic hole as a magnetic dipole oscillating in the plane of the aperture [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%