2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.10367
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pole inflation from non-minimal coupling to gravity

Sotirios Karamitsos,
Alessandro Strumia

Abstract: Transforming canonical scalars to the Einstein frame can give a multifield generalization of pole inflation (namely, a scalar with a divergent kinetic term) at vanishing field-dependent Planck mass. However, to obtain an attractor, the scalar potential must obey certain non-generic conditions. These are automatically satisfied in Quantum Field Theories with dimension-less couplings. The resulting models of pole inflation have special inflationary predictions determined by the full RG running of couplings. Acce… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known [1][2][3][4] that the presence of a pole in the kinetic term of the inflaton gives rise to inflationary models collectively named α-attractors [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. These models can be classified [9][10][11][12][13][14] into E-Model Inflation (EMI) [7] (or α-Starobinsky model [6]) and T-Model Inflation (TMI) [15], depending on the form of the inflationary potential, V α , expressed in terms of the canonically normalized inflaton φ. Namely, V α can be defined as follows…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known [1][2][3][4] that the presence of a pole in the kinetic term of the inflaton gives rise to inflationary models collectively named α-attractors [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. These models can be classified [9][10][11][12][13][14] into E-Model Inflation (EMI) [7] (or α-Starobinsky model [6]) and T-Model Inflation (TMI) [15], depending on the form of the inflationary potential, V α , expressed in terms of the canonically normalized inflaton φ. Namely, V α can be defined as follows…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suitable choice is a generic potential made inflationary by an extra non-integrable pole with p ′ > 2, see eq. ( 10) of [5]. Table 1 shows that the p = 1 critical case is less strongly tuned than p > 1.…”
Section: Pole Exponent 1 ≤ P mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Significant changes occur at two critical values: p = 1 and p = 2. A pole with p ≥ 2 is non-integrable: the ϕ region near the pole becomes an infinite range of the canonical ϕ can field, so the potential gets infinitely stretched acquiring a nearly-flat inflationary form [1][2][3][4][5]. 3 This paper focuses instead on an integrable pole with 0 < p < 2, that gives a finite stretching of the potential around the pole, where the potential acquires the form of an exact inflection point…”
Section: Kinetic Function With a Pole P >mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, for an almost vanishing ∆ leading to degenerate roots θ + θ − T 1, the pole structure become approximately cubic. This gives rise to a new attractor solution where the spectral tilt and the tensor-to-scalar ratio approach the values [95,98]…”
Section: Nieh-yan Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%