“…For example, Hameiri (2009b, p. 569) argues that the Australian government's Enhanced Cooperation Package (ECP) in Papua New Guinea (PNG), which was designed to ‘regionalise’ the scope of Australian administrative power into PNG, created overlapping jurisdictional regimes that were not easily accommodated within the national boundaries of the PNG state, thereby setting the stage for political conflict that in the event was played out in the PNG Supreme Court. Morobe province Governor Luther Wenge issued a constitutional challenge to the legal immunity provisions granted by PNG parliamentary legislation to the ECP's sizeable police contingent, which the Court upheld, leading to the police's quick withdrawal in May 2005 (Dinnen et al ., 2006). This seemingly ‘international’ conflict, in which the position advanced by Wenge and others was framed in terms of protecting PNG's sovereignty, in fact reflected a more fundamental conflict over the relationship between territory and legality, as well as over the nature of controls on the use of executive power, which was fought by coalitions that sought to frame the territorial scope of conflict.…”