The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics
DOI: 10.4324/9780203855607.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Police interviews in the judicial process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we do have the information that the Depositions are written records of spoken testimony, recorded by scribes with the authority of commissioners employed by the government. Thus, the issues arising from the transformation of lay people's speech into institutionally useful written documentation (see Rock 2001;Haworth 2010) must be taken into consideration. We might also want to consider any potential clashes between the expectations of the deponents and those of the officials who had been tasked with collecting the statements -in Wodak's (1996) terms, the "disorders of discourse" arising from "the gulfs that separate insiders from outsiders, members of institutions from clients of those institutions, and elites from the normal citizen uninitiated in the arcana of bureaucratic language…" (Wodak 1996: 2).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do have the information that the Depositions are written records of spoken testimony, recorded by scribes with the authority of commissioners employed by the government. Thus, the issues arising from the transformation of lay people's speech into institutionally useful written documentation (see Rock 2001;Haworth 2010) must be taken into consideration. We might also want to consider any potential clashes between the expectations of the deponents and those of the officials who had been tasked with collecting the statements -in Wodak's (1996) terms, the "disorders of discourse" arising from "the gulfs that separate insiders from outsiders, members of institutions from clients of those institutions, and elites from the normal citizen uninitiated in the arcana of bureaucratic language…" (Wodak 1996: 2).…”
Section: Critical Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para fazer uma avaliação adequada do nível de risco, o/a agente deve contribuir com a sua experiência pro ssional, nomeadamente no sentido de garantir a imparcialidade e a objetividade -princípios que devem ser garantidos na interação entre entrevistador e entrevistado (Artinopoulou et al, 2018); contudo, essa imparcialidade é relativa, na medida em que poderemos perguntar-nos se, caso fosse outro agente, o resultado da avaliação seria o mesmo. Por outro lado, o processo de recolha de informação bene ciaria seguramente de uma maior sensibilidade linguística por parte dos elementos das forças policiais, pois, como demonstrado por estudos prévios (Coulthard e Johnson, 2009;Holt e Johnson, 2010;Haworth, 2010;Rock, 2001), e como se mostrará nas próximas secções, as perguntas colocadas pela polícia apresentam problemas ao nível da simplicidade e da objetividade.…”
Section: As Fichas De Avaliação De Riscounclassified
“…The police interrogation, a question-and-answer process between police interrogators and suspects, is used to elicit confessions that, as unmediated access to the crime reality, are expected to provide powerful evidence for conviction (Inbau et al 1986;Underwager and Wakefield 1992;Baldwin 1993;Milne and Bull 1999;Leo 2008;Haworth 2010). Evans and Webb rightly argue that "the investigative task is the core aspect of policing today and what emerges from that core task is the key element of the ability to interview" (1991: 37).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%